atatürk — CS2 Stats

76561198122481876[U:1:162216148]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,492Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 8 · 2,193 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning50

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD63–34–3Last 10063%Win rateLWLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression3.6

Utility4.5

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels0.3

Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning5.0

Utility4.5

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time535ms−74ms

first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms

Headshot accuracy17.2%−5.6%

first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 8–3

13–0Biggest win — nuke

10Longest win streak

10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

18Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 76% over 17anubisWeakest map · 47% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	19	11–8	58%	-0.01
mirage	S	18	13–5	72%	-0.01
dust2	S	17	13–4	76%	0.00
anubis	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.00
inferno	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.01
vertigo	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.00
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.02
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
cache	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

980Matches

51%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

75.0ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	181	56%	1.04	16.2
Mirage	149	42%	0.93	14.8
Anubis	126	55%	0.98	15.1
Dust2	99	44%	0.92	14.6
Inferno	69	58%	0.90	13.4
Vertigo	65	48%	0.94	14.9
Nuke	60	47%	1.01	15.7
Overpass	30	57%	1.04	16.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy

33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.8%Spray accuracy

73.6%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

532msReaction time

23.1%T opening success

39.1%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

9.25HE damage / grenade

4.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4668 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.1223% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	10–13	-0.03	12%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	18%	28 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	20%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	13%	25 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.02	19%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	23%	22 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.04	15%	20 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	-0.04	9%	18 Aug →
vertigo	13–3	0.06	18%	18 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.00	20%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.06	14%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	21%	17 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.09	19%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.01	13%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	25%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.03	19%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	10%	14 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.05	15%	14 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	15%	14 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	21%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	19%	11 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.02	13%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	12%	10 Aug →
vertigo	16–19	-0.07	15%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.00	10%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	21%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	33%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.00	16%	7 Aug →
vertigo	19–16	-0.02	19%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	6%	6 Aug →
mirage	17–19	-0.01	31%	5 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	16%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	14%	3 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	29%	3 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.02	17%	2 Aug →
anubis	22–19	-0.01	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	27%	30 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	16%	30 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.00	31%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.09	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	11%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	21%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	22%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	18%	20 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.07	31%	15 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.04	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	25%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.09	6%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.09	22%	9 Jul →
mirage	8–3	0.13	13%	8 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.07	19%	8 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	50%	8 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	18%	5 Jul →
overpass	7–13	-0.03	14%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	33%	1 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.06	16%	28 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	24%	26 Jun →
overpass	15–15	0.01	15%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	16%	26 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	36%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	43%	25 Jun →
ancient	15–15	0.03	23%	25 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	23%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	29%	24 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	19%	23 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	15%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	13%	21 Jun →
dust2	2–13	0.03	26%	15 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.03	20%	15 Jun →
nuke	13–0	0.05	22%	13 Jun →
overpass	16–14	-0.01	17%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–2	-0.03	13%	13 Jun →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	16%	8 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.02	19%	8 Apr →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	19%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	24%	21 Mar →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	12%	12 Mar →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	17%	7 Mar →
nuke	20–22	-0.05	30%	7 Mar →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	24%	5 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.02	40%	3 Mar →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	41%	2 Mar →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	27%	25 Feb →
dust2	13–8	0.07	25%	21 Feb →
dust2	16–14	0.07	35%	19 Feb →
overpass	13–7	0.07	33%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–0	0.09	27%	19 Feb →
mirage	19–15	-0.05	18%	13 Feb →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	29%	13 Feb →
anubis	13–8	0.04	16%	12 Feb →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	18%	10 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.01	20%	10 Feb →
mirage	16–13	0.01	14%	7 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.01	15%	6 Feb →
dust2	13–3	0.00	28%	6 Feb →
anubis	13–8	0.01	16%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.04	31%	5 Feb →
ancient	13–11	-0.07	22%	3 Feb →
overpass	19–16	0.03	23%	1 Feb →