ImissEveryShot — CS2 Stats

76561198121785741[U:1:161520013]

799Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,155 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGImissEveryShotFACEITLevel 5 · 1,155 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning45
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48475Last 10048%Win rateLWLWTLLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression4.9
Utility2.5
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch0.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.5
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time579ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–6
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 14officeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2011955%-0.01
dust2B168850%-0.02
ancientB158753%0.02
nukeA148657%-0.00
infernoB115645%-0.04
anubisD93633%-0.01
officeD51420%-0.01
cache41325%0.03
overpass32167%0.01
vertigo31233%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
90.3ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2055%1.1216.2
Anubis875%1.2016.9
Dust2633%1.0217.8
Nuke667%1.3722.0
Inferno367%1.3017.3
Overpass250%0.9717.0
Vertigo10%0.478.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.0%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
576msReaction time
26.0%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
6.18HE damage / grenade
4.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.9919% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4028 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.047% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0827%14 Jul
office13–8-0.029%8 Jul
office7–13-0.0613%8 Jul
mirage13–10-0.058%23 May
anubis15–150.029%23 May
inferno11–13-0.0014%22 May
cache5–130.0310%22 May
cache12–120.0111%22 May
dust27–13-0.064%22 May
dust25–13-0.0312%22 May
mirage13–8-0.046%22 May
inferno9–13-0.088%22 May
ancient13–10-0.0010%22 May
nuke7–13-0.0314%22 May
mirage6–13-0.0414%11 May
anubis10–13-0.0114%11 May
anubis10–13-0.0211%6 May
nuke13–110.0210%6 May
anubis13–50.067%4 May
nuke13–9-0.0419%4 May
cache13–70.0915%2 May
cache10–13-0.0018%2 May
overpass13–7-0.108%1 May
mirage13–00.0333%1 May
dust213–5-0.0212%1 May
mirage7–13-0.0221%12 Apr
ancient9–13-0.1114%11 Apr
dust27–13-0.0726%7 Apr
ancient6–13-0.064%7 Apr
vertigo5–13-0.0717%1 Apr
inferno11–13-0.057%28 Mar
mirage13–70.0720%28 Mar
ancient13–50.0513%28 Mar
dust213–80.019%28 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0214%28 Mar
mirage13–30.0811%28 Mar
ancient13–70.0313%28 Mar
nuke12–12-0.0411%28 Mar
nuke8–13-0.069%28 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0019%27 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0423%27 Mar
dust211–130.0314%27 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0112%27 Mar
dust216–14-0.079%27 Mar
dust24–13-0.057%26 Mar
ancient13–40.014%24 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0317%24 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0415%23 Mar
mirage13–11-0.019%21 Mar
nuke13–60.0113%21 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0914%21 Mar
dust27–13-0.0316%21 Mar
dust28–13-0.009%20 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0315%20 Mar
ancient13–60.048%20 Mar
vertigo10–13-0.0514%19 Mar
dust213–90.0421%19 Mar
office8–130.0118%18 Mar
mirage13–70.0725%18 Mar
office4–13-0.0014%18 Mar
ancient11–13-0.049%16 Mar
anubis6–130.0018%16 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0711%16 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0010%16 Mar
overpass13–50.0914%16 Mar
mirage13–90.0621%16 Mar
ancient13–60.1017%15 Mar
mirage13–10.0428%15 Mar
ancient13–90.0713%15 Mar
mirage10–4-0.0310%15 Mar
overpass5–130.0515%15 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0510%13 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0613%13 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0416%11 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0310%11 Mar
dust213–80.0114%10 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0615%10 Mar
nuke9–130.0116%7 Mar
dust213–9-0.0116%7 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0515%7 Mar
anubis13–90.0112%7 Mar
inferno9–130.047%7 Mar
nuke13–40.058%7 Mar
dust213–90.0313%7 Mar
nuke13–110.0912%6 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0413%6 Mar
dust27–13-0.0413%6 Mar
nuke11–130.038%1 Mar
anubis2–13-0.057%1 Mar
office5–130.0116%1 Mar
dust213–110.0114%1 Mar
ancient13–60.1715%1 Mar
mirage11–130.039%28 Feb
ancient11–130.099%28 Feb
vertigo13–70.0214%28 Feb
inferno12–12-0.065%28 Feb
mirage12–12-0.054%28 Feb
mirage10–13-0.049%27 Feb
nuke13–100.0210%27 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0212%21 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →