countapplesauce — CS2 Stats

TD76561198120292311[U:1:160026583]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

687Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,026Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.2 Developing

Premier CS Rating21,480Pink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7167 of 20592 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning60

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38–59–3Last 10038%Win rateLWWLTLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression6.0

Utility6.5

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels1.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning6.0

Utility6.5

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time607ms−7ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms

Headshot accuracy17.4%+2.3%

first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–8

13–1Biggest win — dust2

8Longest win streak

10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 54% over 28ancientWeakest map · 17% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	30	12–18	40%	0.01
mirage	B	28	15–13	54%	-0.00
ancient	D	24	4–20	17%	-0.01
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.03
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	0.00
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,090Lifetime kills

0.98K/D

4,256Matches

40.1%Match win rate

44.2%Headshot %

16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band

7,677MVPs

1,935Hours (in match)

5,153Bombs planted

1,075Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,077

Desert Eagle18,237

M4A4 / M4A1-S11,110

AWP7,110

P2000 / USP-S5,653

Glock-183,463

SSG 082,416

UMP-452,142

FAMAS1,715

Galil AR1,511

Lifetime map wins

10,373dust2

1,736inferno

952nuke

578train

284vertigo

190aztec

169cbble

70office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy

31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.2%Spray accuracy

76.3%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

608msReaction time

25.6%T opening success

47.2%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

8.0%Flash assists

13.70HE damage / grenade

12.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.6221% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	11–13	0.01	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	25%	20 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.02	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.01	13%	16 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	15%	16 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	28%	16 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.03	19%	16 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.01	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	28%	16 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.05	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	7%	16 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	28%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	7%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	19%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	16%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	9%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.15	20%	2 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	20%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	11%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	20%	28 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.02	10%	26 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.02	16%	26 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	12%	25 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	23%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	20%	19 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	15%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	25%	12 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	16%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	11%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.06	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	14%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	13%	11 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	31%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	10%	10 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	19%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	11%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	16%	9 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	17%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	21%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.07	19%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	19%	6 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.07	24%	5 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	13%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.04	23%	4 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	10%	4 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.06	16%	4 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.08	16%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	1%	4 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	13%	4 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.02	15%	2 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.08	19%	2 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	13%	2 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.00	12%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	17%	21 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	25%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.04	21%	20 Jun →
dust2	12–16	0.02	27%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.02	18%	20 Jun →
mirage	1–13	-0.11	3%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	17%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.08	16%	20 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.02	13%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.04	9%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	15%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	16%	17 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	20%	17 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	23%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.04	14%	17 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.08	18%	16 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	10%	16 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	22%	16 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.01	17%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	11%	11 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	16%	11 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.02	11%	10 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	10%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.02	21%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.06	8%	9 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	9%	8 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.07	11%	8 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.13	11%	8 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.02	15%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.05	9%	6 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.05	12%	6 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.01	15%	6 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	13%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.07	20%	6 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.03	20%	5 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.01	18%	4 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	17%	4 Jun →
ancient	2–13	0.01	14%	4 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	12%	23 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	29%	23 May →
ancient	7–13	0.01	10%	23 May →
dust2	7–13	0.05	18%	23 May →
dust2	13–11	0.00	14%	22 May →