e-boy xD — CS2 Stats

76561198119277857[U:1:159012129]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

830Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,482Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5592 of 25287 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,390 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning61

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8

Aggression7.3

Utility5.9

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning6.1

Utility5.9

Mechanics6.6

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time587ms−6ms

first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy19.3%+2.9%

first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–7

13–0Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 46% over 37

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	37	17–20	46%	0.04
dust2	B	21	10–11	48%	0.04
cache	S	12	9–3	75%	0.03
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	0.00
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.05
anubis	S	5	5–0	100%	0.04
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	0.06
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

361Matches

56%Win rate

1.29Avg K/D

81.9ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	123	59%	1.37	16.6
Dust2	74	59%	1.26	15.9
Anubis	43	60%	1.28	16.1
Inferno	41	54%	1.34	17.4
Ancient	40	48%	1.08	16.6
Nuke	18	44%	1.17	15.3
Vertigo	15	60%	1.24	16.6
Overpass	4	25%	1.29	21.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.3%Spray accuracy

79.7%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

582msReaction time

30.6%T opening success

55.1%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

6.5%Flash assists

7.92HE damage / grenade

14.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4983 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.5854% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–8	0.11	18%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.10	19%	23 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.00	14%	16 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.01	13%	16 Aug →
overpass	13–7	0.05	19%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	15%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	30%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.04	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	11%	15 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.06	20%	13 Aug →
vertigo	14–16	-0.01	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	17%	9 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	21%	9 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	22%	2 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.01	17%	2 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.02	38%	2 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	22%	2 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.06	14%	2 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.07	15%	31 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	25%	31 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.07	16%	31 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	15%	27 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.03	14%	27 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.03	43%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.11	18%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.06	32%	27 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.02	16%	27 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	15%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.03	12%	26 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.10	21%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.09	22%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.04	26%	25 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.03	14%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.12	13%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	11%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.07	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	20%	22 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.06	25%	22 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.04	19%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.14	19%	20 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	24%	20 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.13	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.13	27%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.09	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.13	24%	26 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.04	17%	22 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.11	26%	22 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.07	17%	21 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.02	14%	18 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.01	21%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.07	14%	6 Jun →
dust2	12–16	0.05	16%	6 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.02	11%	30 May →
inferno	13–11	0.01	18%	30 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	11%	9 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.04	22%	22 Feb →
ancient	13–11	0.06	27%	22 Feb →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	18%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.01	17%	21 Feb →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	24%	16 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.05	6%	16 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.03	18%	16 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	14%	16 Feb →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	33%	16 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.13	20%	14 Feb →
mirage	13–8	0.09	16%	14 Feb →
ancient	13–7	0.13	22%	14 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.01	12%	14 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	15%	12 Feb →
ancient	15–15	0.04	12%	12 Feb →
anubis	13–0	0.06	25%	6 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	23%	6 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.01	13%	6 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.00	17%	6 Feb →
mirage	16–13	0.08	11%	5 Feb →
dust2	13–16	0.04	24%	5 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.02	17%	5 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.08	17%	4 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.01	12%	4 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	11%	2 Feb →
dust2	13–5	0.10	16%	2 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.08	25%	2 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.12	21%	1 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.02	13%	1 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.07	11%	1 Feb →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	14%	1 Feb →
overpass	15–15	0.07	13%	1 Feb →
ancient	13–10	0.06	14%	1 Feb →
mirage	1–6	-0.03	13%	1 Feb →
anubis	13–8	0.05	11%	31 Jan →
inferno	13–9	0.05	15%	31 Jan →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	30%	31 Jan →
dust2	13–10	0.11	19%	31 Jan →
nuke	9–13	-0.11	13%	26 Jan →
ancient	10–13	0.03	11%	26 Jan →
mirage	13–9	0.02	18%	26 Jan →
overpass	10–13	0.05	17%	26 Jan →