narwhal

narwhal — CS2 Stats

76561198119215603[U:1:158949875]Steam profile ↗

486Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating19,359Purple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14099 of 31589 tracked
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnarwhalFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER19,359 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning50
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49483Last 10049%Win rateTWWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim8.5
Aggression6.1
Utility4.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch10.0

Sharp aimerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time555ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–10
130Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 30% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%0.01
dust2D2781930%-0.01
cacheA2011955%0.01
nukeS139469%0.01
infernoS86275%0.01
ancient1010%0.03
anubis1010%-0.02
overpass1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
45%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
100.7ADR
25%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2250%1.4017.0
Mirage1100%1.5329.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.1%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
545msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
6.79HE damage / grenade
10.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1864% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–150.0321%27 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0320%27 Aug
inferno13–90.0824%27 Aug
cache8–13-0.0412%26 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0023%23 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0322%23 Aug
inferno13–110.0525%23 Aug
cache12–16-0.0626%19 Aug
cache11–13-0.028%19 Aug
dust25–13-0.0422%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0116%18 Aug
mirage10–130.029%17 Aug
cache11–13-0.0215%17 Aug
cache13–6-0.0619%17 Aug
cache8–13-0.0522%16 Aug
nuke16–140.0120%15 Aug
mirage13–7-0.038%15 Aug
cache13–100.0219%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0313%13 Aug
dust213–50.0213%13 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0014%13 Aug
dust26–130.0112%13 Aug
mirage13–110.0226%10 Aug
cache13–7-0.0221%10 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0112%10 Aug
nuke13–50.0424%9 Aug
dust23–13-0.0914%8 Aug
cache13–00.0541%8 Aug
dust23–13-0.0127%7 Aug
dust29–130.0217%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0128%7 Aug
dust213–50.0112%7 Aug
cache13–00.0724%7 Aug
cache13–40.0315%6 Aug
dust210–130.0115%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0522%5 Aug
dust210–13-0.0411%4 Aug
nuke6–13-0.127%4 Aug
mirage8–130.0021%3 Aug
cache16–140.0519%3 Aug
dust213–7-0.0014%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.0318%3 Aug
cache9–130.0021%3 Aug
dust213–16-0.0120%3 Aug
dust213–80.0820%3 Aug
dust23–13-0.1118%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0013%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0326%31 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0114%30 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0521%30 Jul
dust23–130.0317%29 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0536%29 Jul
cache13–80.0514%28 Jul
cache13–80.0422%28 Jul
dust210–130.0125%28 Jul
nuke13–100.1121%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0026%28 Jul
dust25–13-0.0414%27 Jul
cache10–130.0314%27 Jul
mirage13–30.0511%27 Jul
cache7–13-0.0119%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0116%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0821%26 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0216%26 Jul
cache13–11-0.0226%25 Jul
cache13–10.1014%25 Jul
dust25–130.0823%24 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0115%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0511%16 Jul
dust213–6-0.0415%6 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0919%6 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0213%6 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0013%5 Jul
dust26–130.0730%5 Jul
dust213–6-0.0120%5 Jul
nuke13–30.1015%5 Jul
mirage13–160.0713%4 Jul
mirage9–130.0519%29 Jun
nuke13–10.059%29 Jun
mirage10–130.0518%22 Jun
inferno16–140.0312%22 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0125%22 Jun
inferno13–110.0115%22 Jun
dust213–30.0723%22 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0430%21 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0214%19 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0518%18 Jun
mirage9–130.0122%17 Jun
dust213–16-0.067%15 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0216%15 Jun
overpass15–150.0615%14 Jun
mirage7–130.0218%14 Jun
nuke13–50.0218%14 Jun
inferno4–13-0.045%12 Jun
dust211–13-0.0311%10 Jun
dust213–9-0.0013%10 Jun
mirage13–40.0113%10 Jun
dust214–16-0.0514%10 Jun
nuke13–100.0530%10 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0717%10 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →