ALBRT. — CS2 Stats

BE76561198116376421[U:1:156110693]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

794Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,692 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning59

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateWLWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression8.0

Utility4.3

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 692ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.9

Utility4.3

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time693ms+0ms

first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 693ms

Headshot accuracy26.5%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 26.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–1Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 26dust2Weakest map · 40% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	36	20–16	56%	0.02
inferno	S	26	18–8	69%	0.01
ancient	A	16	10–6	63%	-0.01
dust2	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
overpass	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.02
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

675Matches

50%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

83.3ADR

57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	84	50%	1.11	18.0
Ancient	45	53%	1.01	16.7
Inferno	39	62%	1.14	17.3
Anubis	18	44%	1.10	15.7
Dust2	12	25%	1.05	18.0
Overpass	6	67%	1.05	18.0
Cache	6	50%	1.10	18.0
Train	5	0%	0.73	11.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.1%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.0%Spray accuracy

84.8%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

692msReaction time

42.6%T opening success

39.0%CT opening success

0.36Enemies flashed / flash

8.9%Flash assists

7.89HE damage / grenade

6.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3604 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 39.0389% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	16–13	0.08	45%	31 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	23%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	17%	4 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.03	22%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.09	29%	3 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	21%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	33%	13 Jun →
cache	4–13	-0.00	34%	29 May →
inferno	16–12	0.02	27%	22 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	17%	16 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	22%	16 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	22%	16 May →
mirage	13–4	0.07	31%	15 May →
inferno	13–10	0.02	21%	15 May →
mirage	10–13	0.03	17%	15 May →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	28%	15 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.08	29%	13 May →
cache	13–10	0.07	25%	8 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	11%	8 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	37%	3 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	23%	13 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.05	14%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.02	42%	22 Feb →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	25%	9 Feb →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	20%	2 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	41%	2 Feb →
inferno	13–8	0.03	39%	29 Jan →
anubis	13–5	0.10	33%	29 Jan →
inferno	13–1	0.02	18%	22 Jan →
anubis	10–13	0.00	20%	22 Jan →
ancient	13–4	-0.08	17%	17 Jan →
dust2	9–1	-0.01	26%	17 Jan →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	41%	17 Jan →
overpass	13–11	-0.03	27%	17 Jan →
overpass	13–11	-0.06	18%	16 Jan →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	19%	16 Jan →
inferno	13–5	0.00	24%	16 Jan →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	50%	13 Jan →
inferno	13–8	0.04	32%	13 Jan →
mirage	13–10	0.02	38%	12 Jan →
ancient	9–13	0.01	30%	12 Jan →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	22%	9 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.04	41%	9 Jan →
ancient	13–7	0.10	27%	8 Jan →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	35%	8 Jan →
mirage	4–13	0.01	26%	7 Jan →
ancient	13–8	0.05	11%	7 Jan →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	21%	5 Jan →
dust2	13–8	0.03	55%	5 Jan →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	36%	30 Dec →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	15%	30 Dec →
mirage	13–9	0.10	28%	30 Dec →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	30%	29 Dec →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	33%	29 Dec →
mirage	14–16	0.01	31%	28 Dec →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	16%	23 Dec →
inferno	13–11	0.03	25%	23 Dec →
overpass	15–15	0.03	22%	23 Dec →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	16%	22 Dec →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	22%	22 Dec →
mirage	16–12	0.03	28%	22 Dec →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	17%	21 Dec →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	19%	21 Dec →
mirage	13–4	0.03	37%	21 Dec →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	29%	21 Dec →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	22%	15 Dec →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	39%	14 Dec →
mirage	5–13	0.01	24%	30 Nov →
overpass	5–13	-0.09	21%	30 Nov →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	38%	22 Nov →
mirage	13–8	0.03	40%	22 Nov →
inferno	13–8	0.07	47%	22 Nov →
mirage	16–12	0.06	30%	22 Nov →
ancient	9–13	0.01	22%	21 Nov →
mirage	13–10	0.04	36%	21 Nov →
inferno	13–11	0.02	14%	17 Nov →
mirage	11–13	0.03	36%	17 Nov →
ancient	13–9	0.02	27%	16 Nov →
mirage	13–4	0.13	30%	16 Nov →
dust2	11–13	0.04	20%	16 Nov →
inferno	7–3	0.02	18%	16 Nov →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	30%	16 Nov →
inferno	13–5	0.09	29%	15 Nov →
inferno	11–13	0.02	26%	15 Nov →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	22%	14 Nov →
inferno	13–9	0.03	17%	14 Nov →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	36%	14 Nov →
overpass	11–13	0.01	30%	1 Nov →
inferno	12–16	0.06	27%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.10	32%	18 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	25%	17 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.02	21%	17 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	20%	17 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	11%	10 Oct →
dust2	16–19	-0.02	29%	7 Oct →
ancient	19–17	0.04	31%	7 Oct →
overpass	13–5	0.00	32%	6 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.03	18%	6 Oct →
inferno	13–8	0.03	36%	5 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	12%	5 Oct →