Santan — CS2 Stats

76561198115226774[U:1:154961046]Steam profile ↗

964Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.3 Developing

Premier CS Rating14,440Blue band · top ~31.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11809 of 17863 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning42

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateLWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression3.0

Utility4.9

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.2

Utility4.9

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels0.4

Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time588ms−107ms

first ⅓ avg 694ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy16.4%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.32Best rating — poseidon 9–3

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.01
ancient	S	13	9–4	69%	0.01
mirage	D	12	4–8	33%	0.00
cache	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.01
nuke	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.01
inferno	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.01
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	0.00
debris	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
office	—	3	2–1	67%	0.08
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01
boulder	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.32
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

110Matches

45%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

73.7ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	32	34%	0.86	12.9
Dust2	29	48%	1.03	13.0
Inferno	17	65%	0.92	12.9
Ancient	10	40%	1.00	13.4
Nuke	10	40%	1.45	14.3
Overpass	5	40%	1.00	15.0
Anubis	3	0%	0.89	13.3
Vertigo	2	100%	1.24	21.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy

33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.0%Spray accuracy

77.1%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

592msReaction time

25.3%T opening success

33.2%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

3.7%Flash assists

7.82HE damage / grenade

6.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.2609% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	10–13	-0.00	13%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.01	26%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	9%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	12%	20 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	18%	19 Aug →
anubis	12–16	-0.03	7%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	15%	17 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	21%	16 Aug →
debris	9–5	0.07	18%	16 Aug →
debris	9–5	0.03	25%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	31%	16 Aug →
debris	9–7	0.00	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	20%	15 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.04	14%	15 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.00	10%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.04	14%	14 Aug →
vertigo	16–13	-0.04	11%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.05	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	11%	13 Aug →
debris	8–8	0.01	29%	13 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	9%	12 Aug →
debris	7–9	-0.15	9%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	7%	4 Aug →
nuke	7–1	-0.01	20%	4 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	15%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.01	33%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	19%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	8%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.01	10%	2 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	20%	2 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	0–3	-0.06	17%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	23%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	23%	1 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.04	24%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	20%	29 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.02	20%	29 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.04	11%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	6%	28 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	7%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.06	18%	27 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.04	11%	27 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.02	20%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	16%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.09	22%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	12%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.04	13%	26 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	12%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.02	17%	22 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.12	9%	21 Jul →
fachwerk	12–12	0.00	24%	14 Jul →
boulder	12–12	-0.08	8%	13 Jul →
office	13–8	0.06	19%	13 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.00	8%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.03	10%	9 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.00	14%	9 Jul →
boulder	13–10	0.02	12%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.10	15%	8 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.03	22%	7 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.06	10%	7 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.08	15%	7 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.04	15%	7 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.11	25%	6 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	10%	6 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	15%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.05	12%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	18%	20 Jun →
office	11–13	0.06	21%	20 Jun →
vertigo	13–8	0.07	11%	19 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.01	23%	19 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.00	21%	19 Jun →
inferno	16–13	0.01	20%	19 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.01	19%	19 Jun →
office	13–3	0.12	19%	19 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	13%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	20%	18 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.01	19%	18 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	19%	18 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.04	20%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.01	10%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–16	-0.03	20%	16 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	33%	16 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	24%	16 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	30%	16 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	5%	15 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	20%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.05	27%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	12%	14 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.03	21%	14 Jun →
poseidon	9–3	0.32	11%	14 Jun →
sanctum	8–8	0.06	19%	14 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	16%	14 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.08	11%	14 Jun →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	7%	13 Jun →