Bnarny — CS2 Stats

US76561198048032549[U:1:87766821]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

895Tracked matches39%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,262Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3665 of 19122 tracked

FaceitLevel 4 · 794 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning41

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–42–9Last 10049%Win rateLLWLWWTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4

Aggression5.3

Utility4.9

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning4.1

Utility4.9

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time634ms+17ms

first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms

Headshot accuracy24.6%+1.4%

first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — cache 13–3

13–0Biggest win — dust2

8Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 19ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	19	13–6	68%	0.03
inferno	B	18	9–9	50%	0.02
cache	A	16	9–7	56%	0.02
mirage	C	14	6–8	43%	0.03
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	0.01
ancient	D	9	3–6	33%	0.01
nuke	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
debris	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.00
boulder	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

224Matches

46%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

77.4ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	62	44%	1.14	15.9
Dust2	52	46%	1.18	15.5
Inferno	29	59%	1.16	15.3
Ancient	25	48%	1.07	15.4
Anubis	18	44%	0.98	13.3
Nuke	17	41%	1.11	14.7
Cache	10	40%	1.29	18.3
Overpass	8	38%	1.09	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy

31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.4%Spray accuracy

81.7%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

627msReaction time

29.5%T opening success

37.1%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

8.0%Flash assists

12.05HE damage / grenade

5.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4842 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.5425% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	20–22	0.01	20%	23 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	33%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.16	22%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	18%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.07	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	11%	13 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	30%	12 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	32%	12 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.07	19%	11 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	28%	9 Aug →
debris	8–8	0.03	35%	9 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.04	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.12	20%	1 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	41%	1 Aug →
eldorado	5–9	-0.03	56%	29 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.02	15%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.03	24%	28 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.04	15%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	17%	25 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.09	30%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	38%	22 Jul →
ancient	2–13	0.00	20%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.08	20%	21 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.06	22%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.02	15%	12 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	22%	11 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.08	32%	11 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.09	20%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	26%	10 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	25%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.02	33%	10 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.02	24%	10 Jul →
boulder	11–13	-0.03	20%	10 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.04	9%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	25%	10 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.02	26%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	15%	10 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.05	16%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	19%	9 Jul →
fachwerk	12–12	0.05	34%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.02	18%	9 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	15%	9 Jul →
shelter	13–11	0.05	15%	9 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.04	19%	9 Jul →
boulder	13–10	0.06	25%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.05	10%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	20%	8 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	20%	7 Jul →
cache	2–9	-0.06	0%	7 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	25%	7 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.12	35%	3 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.10	17%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.14	42%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	26%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.15	22%	2 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.04	23%	1 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	20%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.03	29%	1 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	16%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	23%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	30%	30 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.02	20%	30 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	22%	30 Jun →
inferno	9–4	-0.06	16%	30 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	26%	30 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.06	22%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.09	31%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.04	19%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.04	17%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	35%	29 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.18	27%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.08	36%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.03	22%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.08	31%	28 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.01	19%	28 Jun →
inferno	8–8	0.06	27%	28 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.01	18%	28 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.05	18%	28 Jun →
anubis	14–16	0.01	15%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.05	21%	27 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.00	18%	27 Jun →
inferno	6–9	0.09	33%	27 Jun →
inferno	8–8	0.04	11%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.04	19%	26 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.09	31%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.06	20%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.12	20%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.03	40%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.04	26%	25 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	24%	25 Jun →
ancient	12–16	0.01	27%	25 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.04	23%	25 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.06	27%	25 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.14	22%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.00	14%	24 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.04	10%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.15	23%	24 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.01	30%	24 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	22%	23 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.02	23%	23 Jun →