Den lilla hästen

Den lilla hästen — CS2 Stats

76561198113493925[U:1:153228197]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

571Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.5 Learning
Premier CS Rating10,337Blue band · top ~53.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6384 of 8738 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDen lilla hästenFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER10,337 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim23
Positioning31
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46495Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.3
Aggression2.8
Utility5.0
Positioning3.1
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 58% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.3
Positioning3.1
Utility5.0
Mechanics1.7
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact3.1

Composite 2.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time556ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy12.7%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — overpass 9–7
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
613In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 89% over 9mirageWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC167944%-0.03
dust2C156940%-0.03
mirageD1431121%-0.06
infernoD1441029%-0.03
ancientS1310377%-0.02
nukeA106460%-0.05
anubisS98189%-0.01
overpass41325%0.00
vertigo31233%-0.05
train2020%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.8%Headshot accuracy
25.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.8%Spray accuracy
57.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
544msReaction time
17.7%T opening success
33.7%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
6.03HE damage / grenade
12.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.7701% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4382 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.7488% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train14–16-0.075%27 Aug
cache13–7-0.0216%25 Aug
ancient13–90.009%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.106%25 Aug
train14–16-0.0610%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0916%25 Aug
vertigo14–16-0.0812%24 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0111%24 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0215%24 Aug
overpass14–16-0.0414%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0714%23 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0311%23 Aug
ancient13–6-0.056%23 Aug
nuke12–12-0.078%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0616%22 Aug
dust212–12-0.0612%22 Aug
inferno12–12-0.079%22 Aug
overpass2–13-0.036%21 Aug
cache6–13-0.0533%19 Aug
anubis16–14-0.038%19 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0311%19 Aug
ancient13–30.0215%19 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0014%19 Aug
vertigo13–5-0.045%18 Aug
mirage12–16-0.103%18 Aug
dust213–7-0.0827%18 Aug
anubis13–10-0.046%18 Aug
cache11–13-0.0525%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0714%17 Aug
cache5–13-0.074%14 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0612%14 Aug
dust213–10.0018%14 Aug
dust23–13-0.0729%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.047%14 Aug
nuke13–40.018%12 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0414%12 Aug
dust216–13-0.007%12 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0217%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.059%11 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0310%11 Aug
inferno11–13-0.090%6 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0014%6 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0413%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.0913%6 Aug
cache13–7-0.053%6 Aug
overpass9–70.1211%6 Aug
dust211–130.0112%5 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0613%4 Aug
overpass12–12-0.0414%4 Aug
inferno8–13-0.066%4 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0511%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0314%3 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0526%3 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0119%3 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0311%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0814%1 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0612%1 Aug
inferno13–60.0218%1 Aug
cache14–16-0.0217%1 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0711%1 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0411%1 Aug
nuke2–9-0.1419%31 Jul
dust216–13-0.0533%29 Jul
ancient13–10.0613%29 Jul
inferno13–80.0517%29 Jul
cache13–11-0.048%25 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0218%25 Jul
ancient13–50.0516%25 Jul
dust24–130.038%22 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1014%22 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0114%22 Jul
inferno9–1-0.053%22 Jul
cache8–13-0.0513%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.077%20 Jul
cache9–13-0.028%20 Jul
cache13–50.0914%19 Jul
mirage2–13-0.100%19 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0111%18 Jul
cache13–5-0.0313%18 Jul
anubis13–10.0513%18 Jul
mirage11–13-0.028%18 Jul
nuke13–16-0.048%18 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0113%18 Jul
cache13–20.0914%18 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0314%18 Jul
dust213–5-0.0223%17 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0014%17 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0617%17 Jul
dust212–160.0627%16 Jul
cache9–13-0.0422%16 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0517%16 Jul
inferno6–13-0.098%16 Jul
mirage8–13-0.129%16 Jul
cache4–13-0.0615%15 Jul
anubis13–50.0324%15 Jul
nuke13–5-0.078%15 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0513%15 Jul
dust213–00.0125%15 Jul
inferno15–15-0.035%14 Jul
cache4–13-0.0110%14 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →