helldog — CS2 Stats

76561198108271185[U:1:148005457]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,326Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 Developing

Premier CS Rating20,018Pink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11881 of 29474 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53

Positioning56

Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLWWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3

Aggression7.6

Utility7.1

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3

Positioning5.6

Utility7.1

Mechanics2.2

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time492ms−89ms

first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 492ms

Headshot accuracy13.4%+3.4%

first ⅓ avg 10.0% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–1

13–1Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 15mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	21	10–11	48%	0.00
dust2	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.01
ancient	S	15	12–3	80%	0.03
anubis	B	14	7–7	50%	0.00
nuke	B	13	7–6	54%	0.02
mirage	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.01
inferno	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

85Matches

53%Win rate

0.95Avg K/D

76.5ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	9	56%	1.05	13.4
Nuke	8	62%	0.90	13.1
Cache	8	62%	1.07	14.6
Anubis	5	80%	0.91	15.8
Dust2	5	20%	1.28	18.2
Ancient	4	50%	0.83	12.3
Inferno	2	0%	0.53	9.5
Vertigo	1	100%	0.69	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy

31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.2%Spray accuracy

60.0%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

499msReaction time

29.0%T opening success

53.2%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

8.1%Flash assists

7.43HE damage / grenade

17.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.3367% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.9765% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	6–13	-0.02	17%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	6%	28 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	9%	28 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.00	15%	27 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.14	0%	27 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.03	6%	23 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	9%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.15	13%	21 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.11	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	2–10	-0.01	17%	21 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	20%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.04	8%	20 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	18%	20 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.07	7%	20 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	12%	20 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.05	20%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.07	16%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.05	13%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.04	8%	19 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.05	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	12%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.03	9%	14 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	13%	10 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	19%	10 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	15%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	18%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	13%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.06	24%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.02	10%	7 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	12%	7 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	8%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.04	24%	7 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	22%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	8%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.07	14%	7 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	11%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	15%	7 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	9%	7 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	11%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.09	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	6%	6 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	5%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	7%	6 Aug →
cache	0–3	0.01	17%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	7%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.07	26%	5 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	10%	5 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	15%	5 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.04	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	13%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.01	5%	5 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	11%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.03	19%	5 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.05	6%	5 Aug →
mirage	3–8	-0.03	0%	5 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.00	10%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.05	16%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.10	10%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.05	7%	4 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	16%	4 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	10%	4 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	11%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.08	7%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.06	11%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.02	12%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.04	15%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.04	13%	3 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.02	11%	3 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	3%	1 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.01	7%	1 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.04	24%	1 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.01	12%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	6%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	9%	31 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.09	0%	31 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.01	14%	31 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.01	0%	31 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	13%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	5%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.06	12%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.08	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	11%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.08	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	16%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.06	7%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	17%	28 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	7%	28 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	8%	28 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	11%	28 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.02	9%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–16	0.06	11%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	13%	27 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.08	15%	23 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	10%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	8%	23 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	6%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.10	9%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	11%	22 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	9%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.01	10%	16 Jul →