ightbetsayless

ightbetsayless — CS2 Stats

76561198101203567[U:1:140937839]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,020Tracked matches64%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,911Purple band · top ~16.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17006 of 33299 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGightbetsaylessPREMIER17,911 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning63
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49465Last 10049%Win rateWWLLWLWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression7.3
Utility3.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.3
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time576ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–6
131Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB1910953%0.01
dust2B1991047%-0.00
infernoC1871139%-0.02
ancientA169756%0.01
mirageA95456%-0.00
cacheA85363%0.01
anubisD51420%0.01
train32167%-0.00
overpass31233%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
67%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
85.6ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1100%2.1119.0
Ancient1100%1.0715.0
Dust210%0.5610.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
572msReaction time
49.4%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.41HE damage / grenade
3.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4529 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.1481% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.1421%29 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0121%29 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0215%28 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0316%28 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0225%27 Aug
mirage2–10-0.0318%27 Aug
cache13–6-0.0613%27 Aug
nuke10–130.0213%27 Aug
cache15–150.0117%26 Aug
inferno10–130.0112%26 Aug
train12–2-0.0410%26 Aug
dust215–15-0.0514%26 Aug
nuke13–30.0918%24 Aug
cache13–70.0215%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0825%23 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0626%23 Aug
dust22–13-0.058%21 Aug
cache8–13-0.1012%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.0526%20 Aug
mirage13–40.0822%19 Aug
dust29–00.0417%17 Aug
train13–90.0418%15 Aug
inferno13–70.1020%15 Aug
nuke13–10.0928%14 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0116%14 Aug
dust213–100.1215%14 Aug
train7–13-0.0017%14 Aug
dust21–13-0.1018%14 Aug
dust213–100.0630%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0115%14 Aug
ancient13–20.0519%13 Aug
nuke13–90.0621%13 Aug
cache13–70.0916%12 Aug
ancient16–120.0513%12 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0228%9 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0717%5 Aug
nuke13–100.0217%4 Aug
dust213–16-0.0322%1 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0325%1 Aug
cache7–13-0.0816%31 Jul
dust216–130.0113%29 Jul
nuke13–70.0113%26 Jul
dust210–130.0122%20 Jul
dust211–13-0.0220%13 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0117%13 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0317%12 Jul
dust213–20.0315%12 Jul
anubis13–80.0719%12 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0214%11 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0815%11 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0331%11 Jul
cache13–100.0322%11 Jul
ancient3–130.0113%11 Jul
nuke13–60.1121%11 Jul
dust20–20.000%10 Jul
ancient13–100.0720%10 Jul
dust213–110.0628%9 Jul
inferno5–13-0.086%9 Jul
dust211–130.0120%6 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0013%6 Jul
inferno8–130.0326%6 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0328%6 Jul
dust23–13-0.0511%5 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0422%5 Jul
dust213–6-0.0124%5 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0711%5 Jul
nuke13–90.0216%4 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0113%4 Jul
dust213–100.0129%4 Jul
inferno10–130.0021%4 Jul
ancient10–130.0120%4 Jul
cache13–60.1625%4 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0843%4 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0019%4 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0117%3 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0315%3 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0122%3 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0321%3 Jul
ancient16–140.0211%3 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0516%2 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0110%2 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0213%29 Jun
nuke6–130.0420%29 Jun
ancient13–90.0113%29 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0218%29 Jun
ancient15–150.0020%28 Jun
overpass7–13-0.079%28 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0021%28 Jun
nuke3–130.0324%28 Jun
ancient1–13-0.1019%28 Jun
ancient13–90.0415%27 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0121%26 Jun
dust26–13-0.0423%26 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0514%24 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0110%23 Jun
nuke6–8-0.0625%23 Jun
ancient13–110.0323%23 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0113%23 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0633%23 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0718%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →