FaZe Electrician — CS2 Stats

US76561198099448711[U:1:139182983]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,426Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,759Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9423 of 51990 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,568 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning53

Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateWLLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression7.5

Utility3.0

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.3

Utility3.0

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time599ms+17ms

first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 8–13

13–1Biggest win — nuke

7Longest win streak

10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	31	16–15	52%	0.01
nuke	B	16	8–8	50%	0.00
dust2	C	16	7–9	44%	-0.01
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	0.00
anubis	S	7	5–2	71%	0.04
inferno	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.07
overpass	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.00
cache	C	5	2–3	40%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

272Matches

53%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

91.5ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	81	60%	1.20	18.3
Dust2	55	55%	1.16	18.1
Ancient	33	33%	1.01	16.0
Anubis	31	48%	1.13	18.6
Inferno	25	48%	1.22	16.6
Nuke	22	64%	1.24	19.1
Overpass	12	75%	1.04	18.1
Train	4	50%	0.96	16.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.9%Spray accuracy

86.0%Counter-strafing

8.2°Preaim

603msReaction time

41.4%T opening success

39.5%CT opening success

0.30Enemies flashed / flash

3.9%Flash assists

6.47HE damage / grenade

5.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3021 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 39.5444% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	-0.04	17%	14 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	15%	13 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.01	17%	12 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	17%	11 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	13%	11 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.04	18%	26 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	20%	21 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.05	33%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	22%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	19%	17 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.02	16%	17 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	5%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	21%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	30%	16 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	20%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	18%	16 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.00	18%	16 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.02	20%	15 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	31%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	18%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	22%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	17%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.04	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	33%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.06	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	33%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.01	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	31%	8 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	18%	28 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	21%	28 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.01	20%	27 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	16%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	40%	26 Jun →
overpass	10–13	0.01	14%	24 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.09	23%	24 Jun →
inferno	0–2	-0.27	0%	24 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.11	23%	24 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	13%	23 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.08	18%	23 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.02	14%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	24%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.05	30%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	19%	23 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.03	20%	21 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.01	23%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	20%	21 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.00	20%	20 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.09	22%	20 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	18%	19 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	14%	19 Jun →
mirage	12–16	0.00	23%	19 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	15%	11 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.09	12%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	20%	8 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.01	22%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.06	26%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.06	18%	7 Jun →
overpass	13–11	-0.01	21%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	26%	7 Jun →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	22%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.05	18%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.00	18%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	25%	6 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.00	16%	6 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.02	18%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.05	22%	6 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.00	20%	6 Jun →
vertigo	11–13	0.01	35%	6 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.03	21%	6 Jun →
overpass	9–13	-0.01	27%	6 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.01	23%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.03	14%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	23%	4 Jun →
nuke	16–13	0.03	12%	3 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.00	0%	3 Jun →
overpass	11–13	-0.03	15%	3 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.06	26%	3 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.07	22%	3 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.01	18%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.01	23%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	16%	2 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.07	27%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.00	17%	2 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	25%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.04	17%	2 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	13%	28 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	14%	27 May →
mirage	13–3	0.01	30%	27 May →
mirage	8–13	0.01	14%	21 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	25%	20 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	17%	20 May →
nuke	13–7	0.00	18%	18 May →
ancient	15–15	0.01	18%	15 May →
cache	13–9	0.06	16%	14 May →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	23%	14 May →
cache	4–13	-0.02	21%	12 May →
overpass	11–13	0.02	15%	12 May →
dust2	9–13	0.00	34%	12 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	29%	11 May →
anubis	13–3	0.03	23%	11 May →