MapeT — CS2 Stats

PL76561198097810251[U:1:137544523]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,592Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4655 of 35291 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,166 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning50

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWLWWLLLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3

Aggression6.5

Utility6.4

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning5.0

Utility6.4

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time507ms−62ms

first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms

Headshot accuracy24.5%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–1

13–1Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 32% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	22	13–9	59%	0.04
mirage	D	22	7–15	32%	0.00
anubis	B	19	10–9	53%	0.01
nuke	S	11	8–3	73%	0.03
dust2	S	10	7–3	70%	0.03
cache	C	9	4–5	44%	0.03
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.00
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,491Matches

51%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

77.7ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	199	52%	1.13	15.2
Ancient	165	45%	1.06	15.0
Anubis	139	56%	1.05	15.1
Nuke	118	52%	1.13	15.0
Dust2	74	46%	1.05	15.0
Vertigo	34	47%	1.01	15.3
Inferno	14	57%	0.98	16.0
Overpass	12	50%	1.05	14.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy

40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.6%Spray accuracy

81.0%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

511msReaction time

31.6%T opening success

51.0%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

9.4%Flash assists

6.16HE damage / grenade

8.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.6252% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–10	0.06	20%	27 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	11%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.03	41%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	24%	26 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	25%	23 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.00	20%	22 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	27%	22 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.04	32%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.10	26%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	50%	21 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	30%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.04	35%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.10	41%	20 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.11	23%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	27%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	19%	19 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	15%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.13	19%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	37%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	22%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	23%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	33%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.00	8%	17 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	13%	16 Aug →
inferno	17–19	-0.00	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.04	19%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	24%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	22%	13 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.01	28%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.05	22%	12 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.00	13%	12 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	15%	10 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	29%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.06	26%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	27%	10 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.01	13%	9 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	25%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.10	23%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.12	25%	8 Aug →
shelter	13–10	0.07	22%	7 Aug →
fachwerk	13–1	0.04	21%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.07	38%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.09	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	26%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.08	21%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	14%	5 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.12	28%	5 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.08	14%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	23%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	30%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.08	19%	29 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.07	21%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	33%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	28%	29 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	27%	29 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.02	13%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.13	23%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	20%	28 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.01	18%	28 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	-0.06	26%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	17%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	18%	27 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	16%	27 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.03	9%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	27%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.08	30%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.10	26%	26 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	19%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	31%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.00	36%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.03	21%	20 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	50%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	21%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	17%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.02	36%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.05	14%	18 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	17%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.06	19%	17 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.03	33%	17 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	25%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.10	42%	17 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	24%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.01	36%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	29%	17 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	17%	16 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.07	19%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.08	13%	16 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.10	19%	16 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	23%	16 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.06	17%	16 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.07	14%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	17%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	20%	16 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	14%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	16%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.07	25%	15 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	23%	15 Jul →