❤TrashPanda❤ — CS2 Stats

76561198095228734[U:1:134963006]✓ No bans

1,080Tracked matches26%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG❤TrashPanda❤FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning51
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45505Last 10045%Win rateLLLWLTLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression6.1
Utility5.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time632ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31141745%-0.01
dust2C1881044%-0.01
cacheC125742%0.01
ancientC94544%-0.01
overpassA95456%-0.01
infernoA95456%-0.02
anubisD81713%-0.02
nuke43175%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
40%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
78.1ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%0.528.7
Anubis250%1.2212.5
Inferno20%0.6210.0
Ancient10%0.7112.0
Dust21100%1.8018.0
Train1100%2.0923.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
633msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.65HE damage / grenade
5.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.503% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–130.0217%11 Jul
dust24–13-0.0012%4 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0733%4 Jul
ancient13–80.0113%29 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0113%29 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0226%28 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0521%26 Jun
dust213–9-0.027%31 May
nuke1–13-0.0612%31 May
cache6–130.0016%30 May
cache3–13-0.0326%30 May
ancient8–13-0.0215%27 May
overpass4–13-0.0721%27 May
nuke13–7-0.0522%22 May
dust211–130.0026%22 May
ancient15–150.0126%22 May
inferno6–13-0.0512%18 May
dust213–30.1324%18 May
mirage1–13-0.110%18 May
anubis2–13-0.0425%15 May
anubis10–130.0021%15 May
dust25–13-0.0712%15 May
dust213–100.0219%15 May
mirage13–10-0.0215%15 May
dust25–130.0319%14 May
cache12–120.0220%14 May
mirage8–13-0.1032%13 May
mirage13–80.0217%13 May
overpass13–160.0311%12 May
anubis11–130.0416%12 May
cache12–10.0217%12 May
mirage13–11-0.0010%11 May
inferno13–7-0.0013%11 May
dust213–5-0.0117%11 May
mirage13–50.0210%11 May
mirage13–8-0.0120%11 May
overpass13–100.0222%11 May
inferno9–13-0.0411%10 May
mirage13–10.109%10 May
inferno11–13-0.0011%10 May
cache13–80.0319%10 May
ancient13–10-0.0311%9 May
inferno13–10-0.0213%9 May
mirage6–13-0.059%9 May
mirage13–60.0418%9 May
nuke13–11-0.037%9 May
dust213–70.0215%9 May
overpass13–11-0.0017%9 May
overpass10–130.0110%8 May
overpass13–50.0411%8 May
mirage13–60.0612%8 May
anubis6–13-0.0511%8 May
mirage9–13-0.0618%8 May
dust213–10-0.0315%7 May
dust22–13-0.0823%7 May
dust27–13-0.0322%7 May
overpass13–4-0.015%7 May
anubis13–8-0.028%7 May
mirage7–13-0.0421%7 May
mirage13–16-0.0010%7 May
dust210–130.0617%6 May
ancient6–130.0314%6 May
mirage9–13-0.0210%6 May
inferno11–13-0.049%6 May
mirage13–80.017%6 May
anubis9–13-0.0314%6 May
ancient1–13-0.0320%5 May
mirage13–7-0.0726%5 May
dust210–13-0.0229%5 May
dust213–10-0.0214%5 May
mirage16–130.0314%4 May
ancient7–13-0.0217%4 May
mirage3–13-0.0321%4 May
mirage13–70.0929%4 May
mirage7–13-0.065%4 May
mirage11–13-0.029%3 May
dust26–13-0.0617%3 May
mirage15–150.0117%3 May
dust216–14-0.0218%3 May
cache10–130.0532%2 May
cache3–13-0.0617%2 May
cache13–90.0116%2 May
mirage6–13-0.0420%2 May
mirage13–100.0527%2 May
cache13–4-0.044%2 May
cache13–60.0516%2 May
cache4–13-0.026%1 May
cache12–120.0515%1 May
ancient16–13-0.006%28 Apr
mirage13–100.0214%28 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0017%28 Apr
inferno13–60.0318%28 Apr
overpass13–7-0.018%27 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0413%23 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0223%22 Apr
inferno13–3-0.0318%22 Apr
dust28–13-0.0112%22 Apr
overpass5–13-0.099%20 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0525%18 Apr
ancient13–5-0.028%18 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →