NC — CS2 Stats

76561198093411174[U:1:133145446]

2,571Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,638Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5286 of 18716 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,837 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNCFACEITLevel 9 · 1,837 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,638 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning51
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49465Last 10049%Win rateLLWLLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression5.3
Utility5.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 11–13
132Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1013In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 70% over 23nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2316770%-0.01
cacheC2281436%-0.00
ancientC2181338%-0.02
infernoS1611569%0.01
dust2A95456%0.01
nukeD51420%-0.02
anubis3030%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,195Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
78.9ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18746%1.0015.7
Ancient12252%0.9815.7
Inferno11148%0.9314.6
Anubis10954%0.9514.7
Dust25050%1.0215.9
Nuke4770%1.0716.0
Vertigo3155%0.9614.3
Train1050%0.9316.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.8%Headshot accuracy
29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.9%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
612msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
8.35HE damage / grenade
12.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2996% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.1240%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0217%17 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0127%12 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0432%12 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0530%10 Aug
dust213–60.0430%10 Aug
cache0–4-0.080%10 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0323%10 Aug
cache15–15-0.0623%7 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0925%4 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0620%4 Aug
mirage13–70.1135%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0145%1 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0221%1 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0821%1 Aug
cache8–13-0.0126%21 Jul
inferno13–60.0630%21 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0138%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0539%19 Jul
cache13–110.0427%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0220%13 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0126%9 Jul
cache13–20.1138%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0237%7 Jul
dust27–13-0.0048%7 Jul
cache10–13-0.0322%3 Jul
dust213–20.0536%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.1325%24 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0645%24 Jun
cache11–13-0.0429%24 Jun
inferno13–20.0840%23 Jun
mirage13–90.0233%23 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0329%18 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0414%12 Jun
nuke13–100.0435%12 Jun
dust22–13-0.0732%10 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0231%10 Jun
overpass2–1-0.03100%10 Jun
cache9–13-0.0227%9 Jun
mirage13–80.0321%29 May
ancient13–30.0828%28 May
dust24–13-0.0234%28 May
ancient5–13-0.0520%24 May
nuke7–13-0.0029%24 May
dust210–13-0.0433%24 May
inferno11–13-0.0325%22 May
mirage13–100.0222%22 May
cache12–120.0222%22 May
mirage19–17-0.0131%13 May
inferno13–8-0.0232%13 May
cache13–10-0.0331%11 May
nuke0–2-0.03100%8 May
ancient6–130.0130%8 May
inferno13–50.0531%8 May
ancient4–13-0.0233%8 May
inferno16–13-0.0333%5 May
cache5–13-0.0121%5 May
mirage13–4-0.0020%1 May
dust213–60.0425%1 May
cache13–11-0.0019%30 Apr
cache7–130.0326%30 Apr
cache4–130.0124%30 Apr
cache9–13-0.0439%30 Apr
cache3–20.0845%30 Apr
cache13–9-0.0232%29 Apr
cache12–12-0.0332%29 Apr
cache13–50.0235%29 Apr
cache13–60.0036%29 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0623%29 Apr
cache13–11-0.0033%28 Apr
cache12–12-0.0424%28 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0316%28 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0126%28 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0927%28 Apr
ancient13–110.0116%23 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0039%23 Apr
ancient13–70.0518%23 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0618%23 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0522%22 Apr
inferno11–130.0322%22 Apr
inferno16–12-0.0022%15 Apr
inferno1–8-0.080%13 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0129%13 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0429%13 Apr
ancient13–90.0524%12 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0533%9 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0741%8 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0138%8 Apr
inferno13–60.0039%8 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0631%8 Apr
ancient13–30.0533%8 Apr
inferno13–90.0925%1 Apr
mirage13–100.0338%1 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0612%1 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0425%31 Mar
dust213–80.0535%29 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0228%29 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0029%28 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0027%24 Mar
dust213–100.0419%24 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →