Toasty — CS2 Stats

76561198040596370[U:1:80330642]

2,511Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,557Purple band · top ~10.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11419 of 25398 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,898 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGToastyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,898 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,557 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning46
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression5.6
Utility6.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.6
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time616ms+54ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — eldorado 9–1
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%0.00
infernoB179853%0.03
cacheS1510567%-0.00
ancientC156940%-0.01
dust2C114736%0.00
nukeD62433%-0.01
anubisB63350%0.02
train31233%-0.02
eldorado110100%0.13
vertigo1010%0.06
overpass1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

799Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
74.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9754%1.0215.1
Anubis8156%1.0414.2
Inferno7057%1.1315.8
Mirage6143%0.9013.6
Vertigo3647%1.0915.9
Nuke3462%1.1216.5
Dust23234%0.8613.5
Overpass825%1.0814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
615msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
7.50HE damage / grenade
12.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5257% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–3-0.0328%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0129%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0212%1 Aug
inferno13–70.0417%1 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0811%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0120%1 Aug
dust213–6-0.0330%1 Aug
cache13–10-0.0419%29 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0826%29 Jul
mirage13–70.1116%29 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0224%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0721%27 Jul
cache6–130.0111%27 Jul
cache13–3-0.0218%26 Jul
inferno12–120.0113%26 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0529%26 Jul
eldorado9–10.1323%26 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0424%23 Jul
cache13–4-0.0117%23 Jul
mirage15–150.0224%23 Jul
inferno11–130.0120%18 Jul
nuke13–50.0625%18 Jul
inferno13–110.0216%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.0322%18 Jul
inferno13–90.029%13 Jul
cache13–10-0.0219%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0316%13 Jul
dust215–150.0114%10 Jul
ancient13–10.0415%10 Jul
mirage13–160.0113%10 Jul
ancient13–40.0428%9 Jul
dust210–130.0333%9 Jul
mirage12–120.0216%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.039%7 Jul
dust27–13-0.0425%7 Jul
inferno13–30.0926%7 Jul
cache13–6-0.0312%7 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0110%3 Jul
dust213–30.0519%3 Jul
cache13–110.0620%3 Jul
mirage16–140.0412%3 Jul
dust213–20.0424%28 Jun
cache12–120.0529%28 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0131%28 Jun
inferno13–10.0515%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0418%24 Jun
anubis13–160.0219%24 Jun
cache11–13-0.0415%24 Jun
anubis15–150.0211%18 Jun
mirage8–00.0330%18 Jun
ancient13–110.0117%18 Jun
mirage13–1-0.0028%18 Jun
anubis13–50.0310%16 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0215%16 Jun
ancient11–130.0216%12 Jun
nuke13–100.0321%12 Jun
mirage13–80.0815%10 Jun
ancient13–70.0019%10 Jun
inferno13–40.1129%10 Jun
cache7–130.0117%10 Jun
dust215–15-0.0318%8 Jun
ancient9–130.0221%8 Jun
inferno13–30.0127%5 Jun
dust29–130.0012%5 Jun
mirage13–70.0118%5 Jun
anubis13–90.0815%3 Jun
ancient13–100.0224%3 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0317%1 Jun
mirage8–130.0118%1 Jun
dust26–13-0.0130%1 Jun
vertigo9–130.0624%1 Jun
train8–13-0.0420%1 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0727%30 May
inferno8–130.0220%30 May
inferno4–130.018%26 May
dust213–100.0132%26 May
mirage13–50.0117%26 May
ancient5–13-0.0412%24 May
nuke7–13-0.0224%24 May
dust210–13-0.0319%24 May
overpass4–13-0.0129%24 May
inferno8–13-0.0323%23 May
mirage13–11-0.0316%23 May
inferno13–40.088%23 May
inferno11–130.0212%22 May
mirage13–10-0.0319%22 May
mirage13–11-0.0013%21 May
inferno13–30.1028%21 May
nuke7–13-0.0319%17 May
mirage13–11-0.0413%17 May
cache13–70.0313%17 May
train13–9-0.0019%17 May
ancient11–130.0012%15 May
train9–13-0.0217%15 May
cache13–110.0416%15 May
ancient6–13-0.036%15 May
inferno7–13-0.027%15 May
cache16–14-0.0223%13 May
mirage8–130.0610%13 May
ancient10–130.0015%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →