Zombs

Zombs — CS2 Stats

US76561198092256720[U:1:131990992]Steam profile ↗

1,120Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,046Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4265 of 12906 tracked
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZombsPREMIER22,046 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning57
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateWWWLLWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9
Aggression7.6
Utility5.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time590ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy30.1%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 29.7% → last ⅓ avg 30.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 10–1
132Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26141254%0.02
dust2A2415963%0.02
nukeS139469%-0.01
ancientS139469%0.03
infernoC125742%-0.00
anubisD93633%0.01
cache21150%0.02
overpass1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,064Matches
52%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
75.0ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8351%1.0715.5
Dust24953%1.0616.4
Inferno4347%1.0515.6
Anubis4260%1.1016.6
Ancient3132%0.9014.9
Nuke1346%1.0216.1
Train667%0.7914.7
Vertigo367%1.3616.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.9%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
601msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
9.91HE damage / grenade
10.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1569% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0828%27 Aug
dust213–70.0555%27 Aug
mirage13–90.0630%26 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0125%26 Aug
cache9–130.0239%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0423%25 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0331%24 Aug
nuke13–70.0126%23 Aug
dust211–10.0532%29 Jul
ancient15–150.0126%29 Jul
mirage9–130.0032%27 Jul
dust213–80.0634%27 Jul
dust213–80.0531%27 Jul
mirage7–130.0821%26 Jul
ancient13–40.0631%21 Jul
mirage13–40.0441%19 Jul
inferno5–130.0133%17 Jul
ancient13–50.0534%17 Jul
mirage13–60.1241%12 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0425%9 Jul
mirage11–130.0537%7 Jul
dust213–80.0928%7 Jul
dust28–130.0517%7 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0611%3 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0132%3 Jul
inferno13–20.0627%3 Jul
dust216–14-0.0138%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0525%30 Jun
dust213–90.0321%30 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0320%30 Jun
anubis13–80.0338%29 Jun
dust213–60.0444%27 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0119%27 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0024%27 Jun
nuke16–12-0.0132%25 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0129%25 Jun
mirage13–50.0340%25 Jun
inferno14–160.0229%25 Jun
dust23–13-0.129%24 Jun
ancient13–20.0646%24 Jun
dust26–130.0020%23 Jun
anubis13–80.0121%23 Jun
ancient13–110.0133%22 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0627%22 Jun
dust21–13-0.0115%9 Jun
dust213–8-0.0529%9 Jun
dust213–80.0938%8 Jun
mirage10–130.0030%5 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0118%4 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0026%4 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0147%27 May
mirage13–40.0640%27 May
mirage13–50.0135%25 May
nuke10–13-0.0422%25 May
nuke2–130.0150%25 May
mirage15–15-0.0331%21 May
overpass11–130.0021%20 May
dust213–110.0544%20 May
ancient13–50.0033%20 May
anubis11–130.0333%18 May
mirage8–130.0217%18 May
inferno8–130.0122%14 May
dust27–13-0.0224%14 May
mirage13–100.0624%14 May
inferno7–13-0.049%10 May
anubis7–13-0.0129%8 May
cache13–70.0338%4 May
nuke6–13-0.0227%26 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0724%26 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0121%25 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0221%25 Apr
dust213–110.0539%17 Apr
ancient13–40.0523%13 Apr
anubis3–130.0136%12 Apr
nuke13–60.0043%12 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0227%8 Apr
nuke13–90.0128%5 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0134%5 Apr
mirage10–10.2027%5 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0232%5 Apr
mirage16–140.0529%1 Apr
dust23–13-0.0435%1 Apr
dust28–13-0.0535%29 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0231%28 Mar
nuke16–12-0.0120%28 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0327%28 Mar
ancient13–40.0614%22 Mar
dust213–60.1045%22 Mar
nuke13–80.0427%22 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0427%22 Mar
dust215–15-0.0433%19 Mar
inferno13–50.0133%15 Mar
dust210–130.0227%15 Mar
dust213–110.0540%15 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0438%14 Mar
ancient13–60.1231%12 Mar
anubis13–90.0528%11 Mar
inferno13–110.0530%9 Mar
dust213–90.0129%8 Mar
mirage13–40.0621%6 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →