LikeJameson — CS2 Stats

US76561198091132376[U:1:130866648]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,671Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,305Purple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6393 of 12896 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning73

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateWWLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4

Aggression10.0

Utility5.4

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels5.2

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning7.3

Utility5.4

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time533ms−51ms

first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms

Headshot accuracy25.1%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 13–7

13–1Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	38	17–21	45%	0.04
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	0.05
inferno	C	17	7–10	41%	0.04
ancient	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
anubis	B	8	4–4	50%	0.04
dust2	C	5	2–3	40%	0.04
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

505Matches

50%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

84.2ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	147	56%	1.30	18.7
Dust2	82	37%	1.08	16.0
Inferno	75	48%	1.21	18.1
Ancient	51	39%	1.10	16.1
Anubis	31	74%	1.32	17.4
Overpass	25	64%	1.58	18.9
Nuke	20	50%	1.22	17.4
Vertigo	13	38%	1.20	17.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy

35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.8%Spray accuracy

84.9%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

530msReaction time

39.5%T opening success

62.1%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

11.75HE damage / grenade

6.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.4849% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–5	0.09	31%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.11	18%	28 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	29%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	21%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.09	19%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	22%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.07	11%	25 Aug →
inferno	7–9	0.08	42%	24 Aug →
inferno	9–3	0.20	27%	24 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.04	10%	23 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.01	19%	23 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.03	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.24	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.06	24%	22 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.06	18%	20 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.12	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.05	25%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.09	21%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	22%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.08	28%	18 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.03	32%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.06	19%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	28%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.08	25%	15 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.10	35%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	40%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	23%	10 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	14%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.06	27%	6 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.08	34%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.09	27%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	30%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.08	49%	2 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.05	28%	27 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.04	27%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.11	33%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.07	26%	22 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.01	27%	21 Jun →
overpass	7–13	0.06	30%	17 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.00	16%	16 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.01	45%	16 Jun →
inferno	6–9	-0.13	19%	16 Jun →
inferno	7–9	0.02	37%	16 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	20%	15 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.01	19%	15 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.04	22%	14 Jun →
anubis	5–13	0.01	28%	14 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.00	45%	10 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.03	15%	6 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	26%	6 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.00	26%	6 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.17	27%	6 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.05	14%	2 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.00	11%	1 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	33%	1 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.05	22%	26 May →
cache	13–5	0.14	26%	26 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	27%	23 May →
cache	13–10	0.08	26%	23 May →
cache	13–8	-0.02	26%	23 May →
cache	13–1	0.08	28%	23 May →
mirage	4–13	0.01	28%	23 May →
inferno	6–13	0.02	12%	22 May →
cache	6–13	0.05	35%	22 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	30%	22 May →
mirage	7–13	0.04	16%	17 May →
cache	12–12	0.09	19%	12 May →
cache	13–2	0.13	26%	12 May →
mirage	13–10	0.11	26%	12 May →
inferno	13–11	0.01	44%	12 May →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	11%	11 May →
cache	13–8	0.04	22%	10 May →
inferno	7–13	0.03	12%	9 May →
inferno	13–8	0.05	16%	9 May →
mirage	13–10	0.08	23%	9 May →
ancient	13–7	0.19	29%	9 May →
cache	13–2	0.09	18%	9 May →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	26%	8 May →
cache	8–13	0.08	18%	8 May →
cache	10–0	0.14	33%	8 May →
cache	6–13	-0.06	21%	8 May →
cache	3–13	-0.03	31%	8 May →
cache	12–12	0.04	21%	8 May →
poseidon	6–9	-0.08	12%	5 May →
cache	7–13	0.00	17%	5 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	22%	5 May →
cache	13–4	0.10	32%	3 May →
cache	9–2	-0.00	16%	3 May →
cache	13–9	0.09	27%	3 May →
cache	6–13	0.12	24%	3 May →
cache	12–12	0.05	28%	2 May →
cache	9–13	0.04	18%	2 May →
cache	13–7	0.08	14%	2 May →
cache	3–13	0.00	18%	2 May →
dust2	13–8	0.03	24%	2 May →
cache	13–11	0.08	39%	1 May →
cache	4–8	0.10	11%	1 May →
cache	10–13	-0.01	17%	1 May →
cache	7–13	-0.01	27%	1 May →
inferno	16–13	-0.01	24%	27 Apr →