Barb

Barb — CS2 Stats

76561198090325485[U:1:130059757]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,304Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.3 Learning
Premier CS Rating7,163Light Blue band · top ~68.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16847 of 22260 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBarbFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER7,163 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning36
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49483Last 10049%Win rateLLLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.4
Aggression3.7
Utility4.1
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning3.6
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time658ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — nuke 2–1
133Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B23121152%0.02
mirageB179853%0.00
infernoB168850%0.01
nukeS1410471%0.02
overpassA117464%0.02
ancientD102820%0.01
anubisD5050%-0.02
cache21150%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.06
train1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
20%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1100%1.0912.0
Overpass10%0.365.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.0%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
661msReaction time
25.6%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
13.98HE damage / grenade
2.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1411° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.3757% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.2231 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–130.0416%4 Aug
nuke5–130.038%26 Jul
anubis10–13-0.038%26 Jul
mirage13–5-0.029%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.009%26 Jul
inferno11–130.0113%26 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0016%26 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0016%26 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0121%26 Jul
inferno6–130.0319%26 Jul
nuke13–60.0616%26 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0420%26 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0513%26 Jul
anubis11–130.0316%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0127%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0414%25 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0115%25 Jul
dust215–15-0.0315%25 Jul
mirage13–50.0216%25 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0419%25 Jul
inferno11–130.0214%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.056%25 Jul
mirage13–30.0226%25 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0413%25 Jul
cache13–7-0.0612%23 Jul
nuke13–5-0.022%23 Jul
dust26–130.037%23 Jul
cache8–13-0.0422%23 Jul
nuke13–100.0018%23 Jul
nuke13–8-0.045%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0321%22 Jul
inferno10–13-0.026%22 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0418%22 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0416%21 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0212%21 Jul
dust25–130.0414%21 Jul
ancient13–100.0317%21 Jul
dust213–90.0118%21 Jul
dust211–13-0.0010%21 Jul
mirage13–100.0211%14 Mar
mirage10–13-0.038%7 Mar
dust28–130.0015%28 Feb
inferno13–10-0.055%20 Feb
nuke13–80.0018%20 Feb
nuke16–130.0116%19 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0914%18 Feb
dust213–80.0118%17 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0214%13 Feb
mirage8–130.0816%13 Feb
overpass13–90.0120%13 Feb
dust216–120.0110%12 Feb
overpass13–4-0.0210%12 Feb
ancient5–130.0611%12 Feb
overpass15–150.0313%11 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0316%2 Feb
inferno7–130.0118%29 Jan
dust213–9-0.0114%29 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0420%10 Oct
ancient10–130.0115%10 Oct
dust211–13-0.0430%9 Oct
vertigo5–13-0.0614%29 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0112%26 Sept
dust213–110.1514%26 Sept
dust213–80.0518%26 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0216%26 Sept
ancient5–130.0411%25 Sept
overpass13–30.056%25 Sept
dust213–90.1316%25 Sept
inferno11–130.0210%25 Sept
inferno13–100.0316%24 Sept
mirage9–130.0516%24 Sept
mirage13–80.027%24 Sept
dust213–50.1617%23 Sept
dust26–130.029%23 Sept
inferno13–110.0818%23 Sept
nuke2–10.2925%23 Sept
inferno10–130.0314%22 Sept
mirage13–60.0918%22 Sept
overpass13–100.0815%22 Sept
inferno7–10.0415%22 Sept
dust213–70.0110%21 Sept
dust210–13-0.0414%20 Sept
inferno13–50.066%20 Sept
dust213–5-0.0312%20 Sept
overpass13–100.1115%20 Sept
train7–13-0.008%20 Sept
overpass13–100.0818%20 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0111%20 Sept
overpass5–130.0219%19 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0724%19 Sept
nuke13–70.0614%19 Sept
dust28–13-0.053%18 Sept
dust213–90.0717%18 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0016%18 Sept
overpass9–130.0116%18 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0426%18 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0012%18 Sept
ancient13–60.0512%17 Sept
dust215–15-0.0014%17 Sept
dust216–120.0411%16 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →