Dilaver

Dilaver — CS2 Stats

DE76561198089612436[U:1:129346708]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,363Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,230Purple band · top ~11.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7007 of 14125 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,722 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDilaverFACEITLevel 10 · 1,722 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER19,230 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57412Last 10057%Win rateWLWWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression9.7
Utility4.4
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time580ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy29.1%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 29.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.32Best rating — poseidon 9–4
132Biggest win — dust2
13Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 28mirageWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2819968%0.02
ancientA1710759%0.03
mirageB157847%0.01
anubisB137654%0.00
cacheB84450%0.04
infernoA53260%0.02
vertigo31233%-0.02
debris2020%-0.12
nuke220100%0.06
overpass21150%0.03
sanctum21150%-0.04
poseidon220100%0.20
eldorado1010%-0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

696Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
77.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust216457%1.1716.4
Mirage13349%1.1416.5
Ancient11043%1.0615.7
Inferno9355%1.1615.7
Anubis7244%1.1016.7
Nuke5353%1.1216.1
Overpass2075%1.3118.6
Train1753%1.1217.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
585msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
60.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
8.30HE damage / grenade
5.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4878 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4633% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.0747%22 Aug
anubis11–130.0146%9 Aug
anubis13–110.0117%7 Aug
dust216–12-0.0119%7 Aug
dust25–13-0.0212%7 Aug
ancient7–13-0.035%5 Aug
ancient13–110.0929%5 Aug
debris4–9-0.0841%4 Aug
vertigo11–130.0245%4 Aug
vertigo9–130.0028%4 Aug
vertigo5–0-0.0938%4 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0317%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0333%2 Aug
cache13–90.1834%2 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0314%31 Jul
nuke13–50.0527%31 Jul
ancient13–70.0925%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0416%31 Jul
mirage2–70.000%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0130%26 Jul
mirage0–4-0.1120%26 Jul
dust213–100.0138%25 Jul
cache13–40.0512%25 Jul
cache7–13-0.0035%25 Jul
inferno13–60.0827%24 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0531%22 Jul
mirage15–150.0024%22 Jul
dust213–20.0434%22 Jul
nuke13–20.06100%21 Jul
anubis13–100.0120%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0831%21 Jul
dust213–30.0838%21 Jul
dust210–130.0329%21 Jul
mirage9–130.0620%21 Jul
ancient2–130.0311%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0323%16 Jul
ancient16–130.0015%16 Jul
ancient4–13-0.059%16 Jul
ancient14–160.0118%15 Jul
ancient13–40.0119%14 Jul
dust28–130.0329%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0623%11 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0429%11 Jul
eldorado3–9-0.1533%11 Jul
debris0–9-0.150%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0237%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0324%11 Jul
dust213–110.0012%9 Jul
dust213–7-0.0324%8 Jul
anubis16–120.0030%5 Jul
dust213–100.0427%5 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0615%5 Jul
anubis16–140.0117%4 Jul
mirage4–100.0225%4 Jul
mirage13–70.0332%4 Jul
dust23–100.0360%3 Jul
dust23–13-0.0414%29 Jun
inferno10–130.0842%27 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0027%21 Jun
overpass13–80.0625%21 Jun
mirage13–50.0128%21 Jun
dust216–130.0548%30 Apr
cache8–13-0.0121%30 Apr
cache12–120.0434%30 Apr
cache13–4-0.0023%28 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0330%24 Apr
dust216–12-0.0333%22 Apr
dust213–40.0317%21 Apr
inferno13–100.0220%26 Mar
ancient5–130.0047%24 Mar
mirage13–160.0538%14 Mar
ancient13–80.0328%14 Mar
dust213–80.0054%14 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0423%3 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0025%28 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0027%27 Feb
anubis13–90.0117%26 Feb
anubis7–130.0517%25 Feb
dust213–30.1334%12 Feb
dust213–100.0630%12 Feb
ancient13–100.1621%11 Feb
sanctum4–9-0.1415%11 Feb
sanctum9–60.0626%11 Feb
poseidon9–60.0721%10 Feb
dust213–5-0.0212%10 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0142%10 Feb
poseidon9–40.3229%9 Feb
dust213–110.0450%9 Feb
dust213–80.1644%9 Feb
dust216–140.0126%1 Feb
anubis19–17-0.0211%1 Feb
dust213–40.0625%31 Jan
dust216–140.0526%30 Jan
ancient13–30.0423%30 Jan
anubis16–130.1126%30 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0221%29 Jan
inferno2–13-0.0628%24 Jan
mirage13–70.0321%24 Jan
dust214–16-0.0128%24 Jan
mirage13–60.1024%24 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches13-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →