Charlievous — CS2 Stats

76561198087330046[U:1:127064318]✓ No bans

634Tracked matches39%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning48
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47494Last 10047%Win rateWLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression4.6
Utility4.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.8
Utility4.3
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time603ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — anubis 9–13
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C23101343%0.01
infernoC1661038%0.01
cacheA169756%0.01
ancientB136746%-0.00
nukeB105550%0.01
anubisD92722%0.01
mirageS76186%-0.00
train32167%0.00
office1010%-0.10
vertigo1010%-0.01
overpass110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
92.2%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
604msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.05HE damage / grenade
3.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4659 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4293% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0514%26 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0324%26 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0616%26 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0425%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0313%23 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0313%22 Aug
ancient11–130.0221%20 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0714%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.049%20 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1119%20 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0527%20 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0219%19 Aug
anubis13–50.0210%16 Aug
dust213–50.1735%15 Aug
inferno13–100.0318%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0525%8 Aug
dust212–120.0019%8 Aug
dust213–110.0131%7 Aug
dust28–130.0529%7 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0715%7 Aug
cache9–13-0.0419%7 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0115%7 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0823%7 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0221%6 Aug
cache13–50.0016%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0521%5 Aug
dust28–30.0129%5 Aug
nuke10–130.0325%2 Aug
cache13–5-0.0142%25 Jul
dust29–13-0.0217%24 Jul
dust213–110.0630%24 Jul
dust24–130.0119%24 Jul
cache13–7-0.0815%23 Jul
nuke13–100.0428%21 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0014%19 Jul
dust22–13-0.1225%19 Jul
train8–13-0.0317%19 Jul
ancient6–20.0331%19 Jul
cache1–13-0.0123%19 Jul
dust27–130.0528%19 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0225%18 Jul
dust26–13-0.0030%18 Jul
nuke13–100.0414%16 Jul
ancient13–80.0130%16 Jul
ancient13–80.0119%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0229%16 Jul
nuke12–120.0713%15 Jul
cache13–30.0113%15 Jul
cache13–40.1121%13 Jul
office3–13-0.1025%11 Jul
mirage13–70.0117%11 Jul
dust28–13-0.0719%11 Jul
dust216–14-0.0010%9 Jul
inferno13–30.0634%8 Jul
nuke13–50.0225%8 Jul
nuke13–40.0839%8 Jul
inferno13–100.0123%8 Jul
cache13–50.0316%7 Jul
anubis10–130.0618%7 Jul
cache13–00.0717%7 Jul
cache13–50.0927%7 Jul
anubis9–130.2013%6 Jul
cache11–13-0.0416%4 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0123%4 Jul
ancient11–130.0312%4 Jul
inferno13–90.0218%4 Jul
ancient8–130.0423%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.0020%3 Jul
inferno11–130.0217%3 Jul
cache13–100.0013%2 Jul
inferno11–20.1221%2 Jul
dust25–13-0.0414%2 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0118%2 Jul
dust28–10.0228%1 Jul
ancient13–3-0.035%1 Jul
cache11–13-0.0119%1 Jul
anubis13–30.0218%30 Jun
dust213–30.106%30 Jun
dust28–130.0421%30 Jun
cache11–130.0114%30 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0211%30 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0825%30 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0314%30 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0118%25 Jun
vertigo5–13-0.0124%25 Jun
mirage13–30.0518%25 Jun
dust213–60.0126%25 Jun
cache8–13-0.018%25 Jun
ancient13–60.0225%25 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0315%24 Jun
ancient11–130.0323%24 Jun
cache4–13-0.0124%24 Jun
inferno12–120.0521%24 Jun
mirage13–80.0232%24 Jun
overpass13–3-0.0522%24 Jun
dust212–16-0.0516%24 Jun
ancient13–8-0.046%23 Jun
train13–110.0425%23 Jun
dust213–110.1113%23 Jun
train13–11-0.0032%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →