shmuel — CS2 Stats

76561198083640655[U:1:123374927]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,138Tracked matches27%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning59

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateWLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7

Aggression7.5

Utility4.3

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning5.9

Utility4.3

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time595ms+6ms

first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms

Headshot accuracy20.5%+4.7%

first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–11

13–3Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

12–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 15dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	23	11–12	48%	0.00
anubis	B	17	8–9	47%	0.01
ancient	C	17	6–11	35%	0.00
mirage	A	15	9–6	60%	0.02
inferno	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.01
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.00
dust2	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.01
cache	—	3	0–3	0%	0.00
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
train	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches

55%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

83.9ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

38%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	4	75%	1.56	16.3
Ancient	3	67%	1.40	18.7
Inferno	3	0%	0.80	13.3
Anubis	2	100%	1.98	26.0
Dust2	2	50%	0.98	14.5
Nuke	2	50%	1.28	17.5
Overpass	1	0%	0.79	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.7%Spray accuracy

80.5%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

594msReaction time

29.6%T opening success

53.9%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

10.2%Flash assists

8.08HE damage / grenade

6.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.482 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.6415% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–9	0.03	8%	23 Aug →
nuke	1–8	0.02	20%	4 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	19%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.01	12%	25 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	30%	13 Jun →
cache	5–13	0.01	18%	12 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.07	29%	12 Jun →
anubis	7–13	0.06	14%	9 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.00	11%	31 May →
cache	1–13	-0.08	40%	30 May →
mirage	0–13	-0.08	13%	11 Apr →
anubis	14–16	0.03	27%	11 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.06	30%	4 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.09	22%	28 Mar →
overpass	10–13	-0.01	18%	22 Mar →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	29%	22 Mar →
nuke	13–7	0.04	18%	22 Mar →
anubis	13–11	0.06	15%	22 Mar →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	17%	8 Feb →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	20%	6 Feb →
mirage	7–13	0.02	17%	6 Feb →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	17%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.09	14%	6 Feb →
anubis	13–11	0.16	45%	5 Feb →
anubis	0–2	-0.05	0%	4 Feb →
ancient	2–9	-0.00	20%	4 Feb →
nuke	3–13	-0.06	25%	4 Feb →
inferno	13–9	0.03	21%	4 Feb →
nuke	9–4	-0.16	6%	3 Feb →
mirage	0–5	-0.01	60%	31 Dec →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	9%	29 Dec →
overpass	13–10	0.01	15%	29 Dec →
nuke	7–13	0.04	18%	14 Dec →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	0%	2 Nov →
overpass	13–6	0.01	15%	2 Nov →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	23%	28 Oct →
nuke	14–16	0.09	15%	28 Oct →
inferno	16–14	-0.00	12%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.06	21%	26 Oct →
nuke	7–2	-0.02	24%	26 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	6%	26 Oct →
overpass	13–8	0.05	18%	26 Oct →
inferno	2–2	-0.09	0%	26 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	8%	26 Oct →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	14%	26 Oct →
ancient	16–14	0.01	8%	25 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.06	18%	25 Oct →
overpass	2–13	-0.08	18%	25 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	12%	25 Oct →
inferno	16–12	0.03	14%	25 Oct →
nuke	13–4	0.07	19%	25 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.13	6%	25 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.03	16%	25 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	4%	28 Sept →
nuke	5–13	0.03	13%	21 Sept →
vertigo	9–4	0.06	12%	24 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	11%	10 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	24%	19 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.00	9%	12 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	18%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.03	22%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.09	15%	22 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	13%	21 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	13%	21 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	20%	1 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	6%	1 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	17%	1 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	12%	31 May →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	12%	31 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.10	13%	30 May →
inferno	7–13	0.01	16%	28 May →
nuke	13–5	0.03	21%	28 May →
dust2	13–6	0.04	27%	28 May →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	9%	25 May →
mirage	13–4	0.13	19%	25 May →
anubis	11–3	-0.03	11%	25 May →
nuke	13–11	0.04	22%	24 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	14%	24 May →
anubis	10–13	0.01	16%	24 May →
ancient	13–11	0.01	9%	24 May →
ancient	15–15	0.05	4%	24 May →
inferno	13–6	0.02	18%	24 May →
ancient	13–3	0.02	18%	24 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	20%	24 May →
train	8–13	-0.07	12%	24 May →
mirage	13–6	0.03	17%	24 May →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	10%	23 May →
ancient	14–16	-0.00	24%	17 May →
anubis	13–7	0.01	19%	17 May →
anubis	11–13	0.02	17%	17 May →
nuke	13–7	0.01	21%	17 May →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	8%	16 May →
nuke	14–16	0.03	21%	13 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	6%	13 May →
nuke	13–8	0.07	21%	12 May →
inferno	13–9	0.02	22%	12 May →
anubis	16–13	0.01	14%	12 May →
train	13–11	0.05	6%	11 May →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	24%	11 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	19%	7 May →