DrunkinR2h — CS2 Stats

76561198083339143[U:1:123073415]

2,681Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,967Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning58

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateTLWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4

Aggression7.3

Utility5.6

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning5.8

Utility5.6

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time591ms−18ms

first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms

Headshot accuracy16.0%−2.2%

first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — nuke 13–2

13–1Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

9–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 39% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	23	9–14	39%	-0.01
nuke	B	22	10–12	45%	-0.01
cache	B	19	10–9	53%	0.00
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.02
dust2	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
anubis	S	9	6–3	67%	-0.00
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
inferno	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

569Matches

53%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

77.2ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	67%	0.84	12.7
Overpass	1	100%	1.23	16.0
Cache	1	100%	1.29	18.0
Anubis	1	0%	0.81	13.0
Ancient	1	100%	1.16	22.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy

36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.6%Spray accuracy

81.8%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

580msReaction time

22.7%T opening success

57.3%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

8.0%Flash assists

11.32HE damage / grenade

7.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.7301% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	15–15	0.05	18%	27 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	12%	27 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.08	14%	26 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	21%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	5%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	16%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	13%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	10%	25 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	13%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	15%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	17%	24 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.01	18%	18 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	25%	18 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	15%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	11%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	21%	16 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	15%	16 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.05	18%	16 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.04	3%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	12%	15 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	13%	15 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.01	17%	15 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	9%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	10%	14 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.00	27%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	16%	12 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	25%	11 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.05	25%	11 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	25%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	20%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–2	-0.05	21%	10 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	17%	10 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	30%	9 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	24%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	18%	9 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.03	13%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.04	12%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	22%	31 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	8%	28 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.03	18%	27 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.09	14%	27 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	14%	20 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.04	13%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.12	26%	20 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.03	12%	18 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.00	20%	18 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	17%	17 Jul →
nuke	16–12	-0.02	20%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	10%	17 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	11%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.04	7%	17 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.02	9%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.05	14%	16 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	15%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.06	15%	15 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	4%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	15%	14 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.01	12%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.05	24%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.00	20%	22 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	42%	4 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.03	18%	4 Jun →
ancient	12–12	-0.02	18%	22 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	28%	22 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	16%	21 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	12%	21 May →
cache	13–10	0.04	16%	20 May →
overpass	13–9	0.03	18%	20 May →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	20%	18 May →
ancient	14–16	0.01	14%	17 May →
dust2	13–4	0.00	23%	17 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.09	21%	16 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	11%	16 May →
ancient	13–7	-0.08	23%	16 May →
anubis	13–11	0.05	17%	16 May →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	14%	16 May →
cache	8–13	-0.00	15%	15 May →
ancient	13–7	0.05	26%	15 May →
nuke	13–9	0.00	26%	14 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	14%	13 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	10%	13 May →
mirage	3–0	0.03	38%	13 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	9%	13 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	18%	13 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	24%	11 May →
dust2	13–11	0.09	20%	11 May →
mirage	13–3	0.05	16%	11 May →
anubis	13–6	0.02	17%	11 May →
overpass	13–10	0.08	23%	11 May →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	20%	10 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.08	6%	10 May →
cache	13–11	-0.01	15%	10 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	19%	9 May →
anubis	11–13	0.03	23%	9 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	10%	9 May →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	23%	9 May →
cache	6–13	0.00	24%	9 May →