Shuff ᓚᘏᗢ — CS2 Stats

76561198083014106[U:1:122748378]✓ No bans

804Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,341Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19670 of 54394 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,279 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,295Peak Premier on CSDB
1,279Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,279
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 72 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,341
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,659 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShuff ᓚᘏᗢFACEITLevel 6 · 1,279 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,341 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,279csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning49
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44515Last 10044%Win rateWLLLWLTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.0
Utility3.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.9
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time638ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6cacheWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25111444%0.00
nukeC1871139%-0.01
cacheC145936%-0.01
dust2C125742%0.01
ancientC73443%0.00
infernoS65183%-0.00
anubisA53260%-0.01
officeS54180%0.03
vertigo31233%-0.04
overpass2020%-0.04
train2020%-0.02
stronghold1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches
59%Win rate
1.54Avg K/D
78.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
641msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
6.91HE damage / grenade
2.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4962 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2504% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–30.0017%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0721%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0716%18 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0010%12 Aug
dust213–30.0214%12 Aug
cache11–13-0.0129%9 Aug
mirage15–150.0021%9 Aug
cache7–13-0.0116%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0614%8 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0218%8 Aug
mirage13–110.0417%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.0117%8 Aug
ancient13–30.0333%8 Aug
nuke4–130.0522%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0726%8 Aug
mirage13–30.0116%8 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0836%2 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0420%2 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0122%2 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0621%1 Aug
cache11–13-0.085%1 Aug
cache13–60.0116%1 Aug
anubis13–2-0.029%1 Aug
mirage8–130.0017%24 Jul
cache13–60.0417%24 Jul
dust213–11-0.0418%24 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0420%25 May
mirage13–10.1714%25 May
cache12–12-0.0426%23 May
stronghold5–130.0215%23 May
cache5–13-0.0513%20 May
cache5–13-0.0421%20 May
dust26–13-0.0621%20 May
mirage13–10-0.0021%16 May
ancient11–13-0.0322%16 May
cache7–13-0.0121%1 May
cache13–40.0822%1 May
cache13–8-0.0126%30 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0429%29 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0121%29 Apr
inferno13–90.0520%29 Apr
cache3–13-0.0515%29 Apr
cache13–110.0630%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0419%24 Apr
dust28–13-0.0813%24 Apr
dust210–130.0026%17 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0128%15 Apr
mirage13–110.1126%15 Apr
dust213–60.1418%15 Apr
dust215–150.0429%15 Apr
nuke13–50.0017%14 Apr
nuke4–130.0122%25 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0615%24 Mar
inferno13–100.0119%23 Mar
office13–70.0036%7 Mar
office12–12-0.0524%7 Mar
vertigo5–13-0.0129%1 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0612%26 Feb
office13–80.1217%26 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0528%26 Feb
office13–90.0730%26 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0518%14 Feb
nuke13–70.0111%14 Feb
anubis7–20.0147%14 Feb
dust213–160.0116%13 Feb
dust211–130.0819%13 Feb
mirage10–130.0016%13 Feb
anubis13–6-0.0318%5 Feb
mirage13–60.0124%5 Feb
nuke11–130.0119%5 Feb
mirage13–60.0120%4 Feb
mirage13–80.0130%4 Feb
dust213–3-0.0124%4 Feb
mirage2–130.0319%4 Feb
ancient12–160.0115%4 Feb
nuke13–110.0124%4 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0223%4 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0516%4 Feb
anubis10–130.0124%3 Feb
overpass6–130.0130%2 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0227%2 Feb
mirage5–130.0714%2 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0626%1 Feb
nuke13–90.1025%1 Feb
nuke13–5-0.019%1 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0435%26 Jan
office13–110.0031%21 Jan
vertigo13–6-0.0325%21 Jan
inferno16–140.0017%6 Jan
train10–13-0.0123%6 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0211%6 Jan
train6–13-0.0226%6 Jan
nuke3–13-0.0925%6 Jan
dust28–13-0.0321%27 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0117%27 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0213%27 Dec
overpass2–13-0.0830%26 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0017%26 Dec
nuke10–13-0.0125%24 Dec
dust213–40.0421%24 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →