JTjazzmatazz — CS2 Stats

76561198083000887[U:1:122735159]✓ No bans

1,022Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,095Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4935 of 15312 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,164 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJTjazzmatazzFACEITLevel 9 · 2,164 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,095 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning48
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression5.4
Utility4.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.2

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 43% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.8
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time614ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–7
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
1210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 26anubisWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35161946%0.00
ancientA26161062%0.01
anubisC1881044%-0.01
mirageB178947%0.00
inferno3030%-0.04
nuke110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,783Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
75.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust216259%1.1716.5
Mirage12546%1.1115.3
Ancient8358%1.1816.2
Anubis6948%1.0716.7
Inferno2540%0.9515.7
Vertigo560%1.0816.4
Overpass425%0.7410.8
Nuke333%1.2018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
616msReaction time
42.7%T opening success
25.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
10.02HE damage / grenade
5.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 25.9349% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0329%5 May
dust213–40.0428%4 May
mirage13–40.1038%2 May
dust213–100.0330%1 May
anubis4–13-0.0338%30 Apr
dust28–13-0.0320%13 Apr
ancient13–20.0925%13 Apr
dust213–110.0622%13 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0524%12 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0111%12 Apr
dust215–19-0.0326%12 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0225%11 Apr
anubis13–3-0.049%11 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0021%5 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0417%4 Apr
dust214–160.0427%2 Apr
dust27–130.0030%2 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0140%2 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0415%1 Apr
dust213–110.0118%1 Apr
dust213–60.0117%1 Apr
mirage16–12-0.0224%31 Mar
dust28–13-0.0435%30 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0611%30 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0631%29 Mar
ancient8–130.0839%29 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0227%29 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0718%22 Mar
dust21–13-0.0724%22 Mar
dust213–11-0.0925%21 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0220%10 Mar
mirage13–80.0827%10 Mar
ancient19–17-0.0417%7 Mar
dust210–130.0235%7 Mar
dust213–20.0521%7 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0019%7 Mar
mirage13–60.0618%7 Mar
dust213–11-0.0229%6 Mar
ancient13–70.0729%3 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0119%15 Feb
dust213–100.0333%11 Feb
dust27–13-0.0132%8 Feb
dust213–6-0.0119%7 Feb
anubis13–70.0121%7 Feb
dust27–130.0120%5 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0122%4 Feb
dust27–13-0.0219%4 Feb
anubis13–80.0512%2 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0312%2 Feb
ancient13–20.0123%1 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0228%1 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0929%30 Jan
anubis19–16-0.0320%30 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0117%29 Jan
mirage13–70.1043%29 Jan
dust211–130.0217%29 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0415%28 Jan
dust213–50.0438%28 Jan
anubis13–6-0.0411%27 Jan
anubis15–15-0.0220%25 Jan
dust213–70.1039%25 Jan
dust26–13-0.0228%25 Jan
dust216–130.0418%25 Jan
anubis15–150.0223%25 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0018%24 Jan
dust213–5-0.0039%24 Jan
dust213–70.0221%24 Jan
ancient13–110.0429%24 Jan
anubis13–70.0238%24 Jan
ancient2–13-0.0425%24 Jan
dust211–130.0118%24 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0215%18 Jan
anubis16–140.0125%18 Jan
ancient13–100.0326%18 Jan
ancient13–40.0535%18 Jan
dust29–130.0240%18 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0219%18 Jan
dust213–100.0117%16 Jan
anubis13–160.0024%15 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0120%13 Jan
ancient13–90.0221%12 Jan
ancient13–40.0626%12 Jan
ancient11–130.0221%9 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0133%6 Jan
dust27–13-0.0423%6 Jan
ancient16–130.0824%6 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0326%5 Jan
dust213–16-0.0430%5 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0423%5 Jan
dust211–13-0.0318%4 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0517%4 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0621%4 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0318%3 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0339%3 Jan
dust210–130.0320%3 Jan
ancient13–110.0425%3 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0222%3 Jan
mirage9–130.0326%3 Jan
dust24–13-0.0711%3 Jan
nuke13–80.0720%3 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →