tobyB — CS2 Stats

76561198068917022[U:1:108651294]✓ No bans

2,167Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#6857 of 7983 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,733Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,733
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 267 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtobyBPEAK ELO2,733csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning53
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9
Aggression6.9
Utility5.8
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.3
Utility5.8
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time615ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 16ancientWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35161946%0.00
mirageB24121250%-0.01
ancientD1861233%-0.01
anubisA1610663%0.02
nuke21150%-0.01
inferno220100%0.03
cache220100%0.06
train1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

911Matches
56%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
93.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211455%1.3717.7
Mirage10159%1.3418.6
Ancient6860%1.3618.6
Anubis4149%1.3620.5
Inferno580%1.1215.6
Train475%1.2817.3
Overpass250%1.1312.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.8%Spray accuracy
90.0%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
599msReaction time
29.2%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
11.71HE damage / grenade
7.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.1961% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.0311%15 Jul
anubis1–130.0337%15 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0717%10 Jul
anubis13–100.0218%10 Jul
dust213–70.0429%10 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0113%6 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0814%6 Jul
dust211–130.0311%6 Jul
anubis13–110.0111%24 Jun
dust20–13-0.030%24 Jun
anubis13–80.0514%24 Jun
dust29–13-0.0521%22 Jun
anubis13–30.0720%22 Jun
dust20–7-0.0622%21 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0314%21 Jun
dust215–150.0223%20 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0130%20 Jun
anubis1–10-0.0126%20 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0123%20 Jun
dust29–130.0025%20 Jun
nuke3–11-0.0123%18 Jun
dust213–30.0140%17 Jun
train8–13-0.0033%17 Jun
ancient13–70.0316%16 Jun
mirage10–130.0428%16 Jun
dust23–13-0.0429%16 Jun
dust211–130.0319%16 Jun
mirage13–30.0911%15 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0216%13 Jun
dust28–13-0.0715%13 Jun
mirage13–60.0114%13 Jun
dust25–13-0.0528%13 Jun
ancient2–30.0022%13 Jun
dust213–70.0322%12 Jun
mirage16–140.0419%12 Jun
mirage13–60.0214%12 Jun
anubis13–90.0322%12 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0444%12 Jun
anubis13–70.0211%12 Jun
dust26–130.0438%11 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0116%11 Jun
ancient15–150.0016%11 Jun
dust213–50.0127%10 Jun
dust213–00.1528%10 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0816%10 Jun
dust213–110.0028%9 Jun
cache13–50.0338%8 Jun
dust25–130.0514%8 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0844%6 Jun
dust28–2-0.0617%6 Jun
mirage0–13-0.080%6 Jun
mirage0–13-0.050%6 Jun
mirage1–12-0.120%6 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0419%6 Jun
dust213–2-0.0223%6 Jun
dust26–13-0.1113%4 Jun
anubis2–4-0.0246%4 Jun
mirage1–130.0338%4 Jun
dust213–30.0019%4 Jun
dust210–130.0213%3 Jun
dust20–13-0.080%3 Jun
mirage13–00.0050%3 Jun
dust213–9-0.0318%3 Jun
dust213–60.0725%3 Jun
ancient0–13-0.050%2 Jun
dust213–20.0117%2 Jun
mirage3–20.0117%2 Jun
mirage13–00.0427%2 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0426%2 Jun
dust25–130.0318%2 Jun
ancient12–160.0619%31 May
anubis13–90.0619%31 May
mirage13–60.0117%31 May
cache13–110.0931%30 May
ancient13–11-0.0512%30 May
ancient13–70.0318%30 May
ancient8–13-0.0110%29 May
dust20–13-0.060%29 May
anubis13–20.0520%29 May
dust213–20.0721%29 May
ancient5–13-0.0312%29 May
dust213–50.0917%29 May
anubis6–130.0134%28 May
anubis16–13-0.0410%27 May
dust213–80.0223%27 May
ancient13–110.0225%27 May
inferno13–100.1123%27 May
dust26–130.0730%26 May
ancient15–150.0015%26 May
ancient2–130.0213%25 May
anubis8–130.0625%25 May
ancient9–13-0.0713%25 May
mirage13–00.0720%25 May
mirage13–11-0.0614%25 May
mirage13–50.0525%25 May
ancient16–140.0328%25 May
nuke13–3-0.0233%25 May
dust27–20.0137%25 May
dust20–13-0.030%25 May
mirage13–00.0225%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →