Mr. Nick ☦ — CS2 Stats

76561198082330247[U:1:122064519]Steam profile ↗

2,548Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,113Pink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning54

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateWWLTWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression7.8

Utility3.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.9

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.4

Utility3.9

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time545ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms

Headshot accuracy23.3%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 7–2

13–0Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 90% over 10mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	26	13–13	50%	0.03
cache	A	20	11–9	55%	0.03
mirage	C	19	7–12	37%	0.03
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	0.04
nuke	S	10	9–1	90%	0.06
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	0.02
train	—	2	2–0	100%	0.03
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

636Matches

53%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

82.3ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	45	64%	1.25	19.9
Mirage	29	69%	1.53	17.9
Cache	21	57%	1.21	16.1
Anubis	20	45%	1.16	16.1
Inferno	10	70%	1.43	16.5
Nuke	8	62%	1.35	17.8
Ancient	8	25%	1.14	16.9
Overpass	4	25%	1.14	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy

38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

85.9%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

539msReaction time

38.7%T opening success

52.8%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

7.3%Flash assists

6.31HE damage / grenade

4.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3984 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.7483% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–7	0.06	15%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	38%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.05	12%	23 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.02	17%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	20%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.12	19%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	16%	21 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.01	22%	20 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	43%	19 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.04	30%	19 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.04	18%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	31%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	19%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.04	25%	18 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.05	25%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	26%	17 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.03	24%	7 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.00	15%	6 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.07	18%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	36%	2 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.07	30%	2 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.03	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	24%	2 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.05	39%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.02	16%	1 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	24%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.15	22%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	27%	30 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	30%	29 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.03	23%	29 Jul →
anubis	3–13	0.07	15%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	27%	29 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.17	27%	27 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.02	29%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.18	18%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.03	23%	26 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.03	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.06	28%	24 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.02	13%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	19%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.09	18%	22 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.02	19%	22 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.04	8%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.04	24%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	29%	18 Jul →
cache	11–6	-0.06	14%	18 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	22%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	21%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	19%	17 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.05	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	15%	16 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	17%	16 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.05	13%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.07	25%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	23%	14 Jul →
debris	4–9	-0.08	10%	14 Jul →
dust2	19–16	0.05	27%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	24%	13 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	23%	12 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.00	18%	11 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.04	29%	10 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	22%	10 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	42%	10 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	11%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	23%	8 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.12	25%	8 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	18%	7 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.11	28%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.08	21%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.08	43%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.06	22%	3 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	20%	30 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.05	25%	30 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.07	16%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.04	19%	23 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.05	13%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.03	28%	22 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.02	35%	19 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	14%	19 Jun →
train	13–11	-0.03	22%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.11	30%	19 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.05	23%	18 Jun →
ancient	14–16	0.04	10%	18 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.01	19%	18 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.03	26%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.16	33%	18 Jun →
nuke	7–2	0.20	14%	18 Jun →
train	13–5	0.08	18%	17 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.01	11%	14 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.01	23%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–0	0.09	17%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	19%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.03	33%	11 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.02	23%	9 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.03	26%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.09	25%	7 Jun →