XTazZ

XTazZ — CS2 Stats

76561198080442350[U:1:120176622]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

350Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXTazZFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning51
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60364Last 10060%Win rateWLLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression7.1
Utility4.6
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.1
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time612ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 10–0
130Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 89% over 9infernoWeakest map · 53% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA22121055%0.01
dust2A2011955%0.00
ancientA1610663%-0.00
infernoB158753%-0.00
nukeS128467%0.02
anubisS98189%0.02
overpassA53260%0.03
cache1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

191Matches
54%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
87.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
39%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21258%1.3916.1
Inferno650%1.2117.2
Mirage580%1.3419.6
Ancient560%1.1418.0
Anubis367%0.9314.3
Cache20%0.9815.0
Overpass1100%1.4217.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
611msReaction time
41.9%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
7.13HE damage / grenade
9.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4614 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.8512% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.0215%10 Aug
cache7–130.0126%10 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0413%10 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0725%10 Aug
dust24–13-0.0515%9 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0815%9 Aug
inferno13–100.0413%9 Aug
ancient5–7-0.0316%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0411%9 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0021%9 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0717%9 Aug
anubis13–110.049%8 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0518%29 Jun
dust210–130.0323%28 Jun
dust211–130.0619%28 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0113%20 Jun
ancient13–100.0119%10 Jun
mirage13–100.1030%10 Jun
dust212–20.0321%8 Jun
dust213–11-0.0820%31 May
mirage13–100.0126%31 May
ancient4–13-0.1022%31 May
ancient13–40.0430%31 May
ancient13–70.0726%31 May
anubis13–6-0.007%30 May
dust213–6-0.0330%26 Feb
anubis13–90.0219%25 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0817%12 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0120%12 Feb
inferno15–150.0012%12 Feb
ancient10–130.0418%12 Feb
mirage1–13-0.1226%12 Feb
mirage16–140.0116%12 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0616%12 Feb
ancient13–3-0.0110%12 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0613%12 Feb
dust213–70.0129%12 Feb
anubis13–10.0517%11 Feb
dust213–20.0726%11 Feb
mirage13–100.0029%11 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0318%11 Feb
inferno13–110.0130%11 Feb
mirage7–130.0216%11 Feb
mirage7–130.0418%11 Feb
dust214–16-0.008%11 Feb
mirage16–140.0318%11 Feb
anubis13–70.0520%11 Feb
dust216–14-0.0314%9 Feb
dust213–100.0123%9 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0022%9 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0030%9 Feb
inferno12–16-0.0418%9 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0117%9 Feb
nuke13–50.1114%3 Feb
nuke13–50.0316%3 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0320%3 Feb
dust213–110.0733%3 Feb
inferno13–70.0112%3 Feb
inferno15–150.0416%2 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0141%2 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0127%2 Feb
overpass16–130.0115%2 Feb
nuke13–30.0321%2 Feb
nuke13–8-0.015%2 Feb
mirage13–90.0515%31 Jan
overpass13–50.0816%31 Jan
nuke13–110.0327%31 Jan
mirage8–130.0619%31 Jan
nuke13–160.0426%30 Jan
overpass13–90.1024%30 Jan
dust26–13-0.0623%30 Jan
ancient13–160.0231%30 Jan
ancient16–14-0.0221%30 Jan
mirage13–16-0.0116%30 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0224%30 Jan
inferno13–110.0514%30 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0428%30 Jan
overpass13–16-0.0213%30 Jan
anubis13–20.0421%30 Jan
ancient9–130.0112%30 Jan
mirage13–20.0035%30 Jan
mirage13–50.0132%30 Jan
nuke13–70.039%29 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0420%29 Jan
mirage13–100.0126%29 Jan
dust215–15-0.0516%29 Jan
anubis2–13-0.0527%29 Jan
dust213–9-0.0122%24 Jan
dust212–16-0.0117%24 Jan
ancient13–80.1515%23 Jan
inferno10–00.1522%23 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0213%23 Jan
dust213–00.056%23 Jan
mirage13–30.0618%23 Jan
dust25–130.0010%23 Jan
dust213–40.0316%23 Jan
dust24–130.0524%23 Jan
nuke15–150.0315%23 Jan
ancient13–50.0110%23 Jan
nuke13–70.0115%23 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →