Zedi — CS2 Stats

76561198080206992[U:1:119941264]✓ No bans

1,035Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning52

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression6.4

Utility4.6

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 672ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning5.2

Utility4.6

Mechanics9.2

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time670ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 689ms → last ⅓ avg 670ms

Headshot accuracy22.1%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — vertigo 9–5

13–1Biggest win — office

6Longest win streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 40nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	40	24–16	60%	-0.02
mirage	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.03
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.03
nuke	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.08
office	A	5	3–2	60%	0.02
cache	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
ancient	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.04
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
overpass	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.01
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.09
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04
stronghold	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04
rooftop	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

55Matches

55%Win rate

0.82Avg K/D

67.0ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	5	60%	0.75	12.2
Vertigo	4	100%	0.70	10.8
Nuke	3	100%	0.89	12.7
Ancient	3	33%	0.56	10.0
Mirage	3	33%	0.53	8.7
Dust2	2	50%	0.48	7.0
Overpass	1	0%	0.07	1.0
Anubis	1	100%	0.94	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy

35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.1%Spray accuracy

91.5%Counter-strafing

11.2°Preaim

672msReaction time

36.9%T opening success

39.4%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

8.21HE damage / grenade

10.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.489 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.8985% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	9–13	0.02	17%	27 Aug →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	22%	20 Aug →
office	13–7	0.06	37%	19 Aug →
mirage	0–5	-0.07	0%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	29%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	26%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.07	23%	14 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	32%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	11%	12 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.07	24%	6 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	4%	6 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	35%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	30%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	27%	4 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	25%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	22%	29 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	32%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	21%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.06	16%	23 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.01	19%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	14%	19 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.04	18%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	18%	18 Jun →
ancient	0–12	-0.04	21%	18 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	26%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.01	17%	11 Jun →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	26%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.01	31%	10 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.03	22%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	20%	13 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	21%	13 May →
dust2	7–13	0.01	10%	6 May →
office	13–1	0.06	30%	6 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	31%	6 May →
cache	13–4	-0.07	17%	6 May →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	0%	17 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.01	30%	15 Apr →
inferno	6–13	0.02	27%	15 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	14%	15 Apr →
anubis	0–13	-0.08	33%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.02	8%	15 Apr →
nuke	2–13	-0.08	38%	15 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	23%	15 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	13%	31 Mar →
inferno	12–4	-0.05	38%	31 Mar →
inferno	13–9	-0.07	8%	31 Mar →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	19%	24 Mar →
inferno	13–7	-0.08	17%	24 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	34%	19 Mar →
dust2	11–13	0.04	24%	19 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.02	22%	19 Mar →
vertigo	9–5	0.11	37%	19 Mar →
poseidon	9–3	0.11	28%	19 Mar →
inferno	4–9	0.04	22%	19 Mar →
inferno	6–9	-0.00	20%	19 Mar →
vertigo	5–13	-0.03	11%	19 Mar →
train	1–13	-0.06	19%	19 Mar →
warden	12–7	-0.04	18%	19 Mar →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	26%	17 Mar →
vertigo	5–9	-0.05	19%	17 Mar →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	9%	17 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	20%	17 Mar →
overpass	13–8	-0.04	16%	16 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	33%	12 Mar →
nuke	3–13	-0.13	43%	12 Mar →
anubis	13–2	-0.09	10%	11 Mar →
stronghold	13–6	0.04	22%	11 Mar →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	13%	11 Mar →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	17%	11 Mar →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	31%	10 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.10	19%	8 Mar →
dust2	15–15	-0.05	19%	8 Mar →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	17%	8 Mar →
office	12–12	0.01	11%	6 Mar →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	30%	6 Mar →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	10%	5 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.00	18%	4 Mar →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	16%	4 Mar →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	31%	4 Mar →
office	13–8	-0.04	30%	3 Mar →
dust2	13–3	0.02	36%	3 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	7%	3 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	18%	3 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	23%	24 Feb →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	12%	17 Feb →
dust2	13–6	-0.06	25%	17 Feb →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	20%	8 Feb →
dust2	0–13	-0.01	25%	10 Jan →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	24%	7 Jan →
inferno	5–9	-0.11	19%	7 Jan →
vertigo	9–7	-0.06	57%	6 Jan →
rooftop	4–9	-0.08	22%	6 Jan →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	16%	6 Jan →
dust2	13–10	-0.07	12%	5 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	22%	1 Jan →
dust2	13–11	0.06	22%	1 Jan →
mirage	13–11	-0.08	17%	1 Jan →
inferno	9–1	0.01	0%	1 Jan →
mirage	7–13	0.01	20%	1 Jan →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	15%	1 Jan →