C'moN CuZ™ — CS2 Stats

76561198073063287[U:1:112797559]

1,512Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 Developing

Premier CS Rating18,142Purple band · top ~15.9% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning48

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–40–1Last 10059%Win rateWWWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression4.9

Utility4.1

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.4

Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.8

Utility4.1

Mechanics3.6

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time565ms−53ms

first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms

Headshot accuracy20.9%−2.8%

first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 13–1

13–1Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

W6Current streak

11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 85% over 13dust2Weakest map · 39% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	31	18–13	58%	-0.01
cache	S	20	13–7	65%	-0.01
dust2	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.03
inferno	S	13	11–2	85%	-0.01
mirage	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.03
overpass	S	6	5–1	83%	-0.02
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches

53%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

70.9ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	12	58%	0.85	15.2
Dust2	9	44%	0.87	15.0
Nuke	7	86%	0.93	14.1
Train	4	25%	0.76	16.5
Ancient	3	33%	0.88	21.7
Cache	2	100%	1.28	18.0
Mirage	1	100%	1.36	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy

31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

66.2%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

572msReaction time

30.0%T opening success

41.5%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

8.53HE damage / grenade

2.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4142 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.9774% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–6	0.02	50%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.10	27%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.05	9%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.06	22%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	18%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	23%	24 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.03	23%	23 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.00	27%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	16%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	6%	21 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.10	26%	21 Aug →
cache	2–10	-0.05	26%	21 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	38%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	16%	19 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.00	13%	19 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	22%	19 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	14%	18 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	21%	18 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.06	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	14%	17 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.06	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	17%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.05	27%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	30%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	23%	15 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.07	13%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	13%	12 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	19%	11 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.04	22%	11 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	33%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	26%	10 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.03	21%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	14%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.02	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	10%	9 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.04	26%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	14%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.06	10%	7 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	20%	6 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.01	22%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	18%	5 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.07	22%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	20%	4 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	24%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.05	24%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	23%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	30%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	13%	29 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	26%	26 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	11%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	21%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	26%	25 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	7%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	14%	21 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	15%	20 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	22%	20 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	19%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.05	8%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.05	15%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.06	22%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–2	-0.01	17%	18 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	17%	17 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.05	12%	15 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	38%	9 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	25%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	15%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.05	15%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–3	0.06	35%	4 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	28%	4 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	19%	4 Jul →
nuke	3–13	0.02	24%	3 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	17%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	83%	1 Jul →
dust2	6–0	0.05	14%	1 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	19%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	33%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	20%	30 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	33%	30 Jun →
overpass	5–4	-0.06	29%	30 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.00	19%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	28%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–6	-0.03	11%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	25%	26 Jun →
overpass	9–13	-0.07	23%	26 Jun →
nuke	16–14	-0.05	20%	25 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	7%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	11%	24 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.00	14%	23 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	22%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.06	24%	23 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	27%	23 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	15%	21 Jun →
overpass	16–14	-0.06	22%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	25%	17 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.08	25%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	17%	16 Jun →