excellent808 — CS2 Stats

76561198071674268[U:1:111408540]

439Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,845Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning57

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWLWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression9.1

Utility4.3

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels4.6

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.7

Utility4.3

Mechanics8.9

Opening Duels4.6

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time595ms+6ms

first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms

Headshot accuracy28.5%−1.0%

first ⅓ avg 29.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–7

13–0Biggest win — cache

9Longest win streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	25	14–11	56%	-0.01
mirage	B	21	11–10	52%	0.01
dust2	B	19	9–10	47%	0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	0.04
ancient	S	10	7–3	70%	-0.00
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

622Matches

55%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

85.8ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	24	54%	1.40	18.1
Dust2	13	69%	1.26	16.4
Cache	9	56%	1.33	17.7
Inferno	6	50%	1.68	22.2
Nuke	6	83%	1.29	16.3
Anubis	4	50%	1.26	16.3
Ancient	3	67%	1.17	14.7
Vertigo	1	0%	1.19	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.3%Spray accuracy

90.1%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

593msReaction time

33.8%T opening success

63.3%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

7.21HE damage / grenade

9.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4656 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.8088% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	-0.00	21%	28 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	24%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.00	19%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.06	29%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	31%	26 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	30%	26 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	31%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	33%	23 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	32%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	28%	23 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.02	27%	22 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.01	27%	22 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.01	22%	21 Aug →
cache	19–15	-0.03	23%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.08	45%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.05	26%	20 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.03	24%	20 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.03	33%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	15%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.10	26%	18 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	34%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.08	31%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.05	23%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	16%	14 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	34%	7 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.01	17%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	24%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	7%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	33%	5 Aug →
dust2	0–2	0.08	100%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	18%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	28%	5 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	29%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	26%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.00	22%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	36%	29 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	30%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	27%	29 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.10	7%	29 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	21%	29 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	21%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.02	26%	29 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.05	33%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	18%	29 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.08	43%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.05	27%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	34%	28 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.02	31%	28 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.07	35%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.02	23%	24 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.11	33%	24 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.02	32%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	32%	24 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.00	19%	24 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	44%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.01	35%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.00	38%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.03	33%	24 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	28%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	24%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	18%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.12	40%	22 Jul →
nuke	5–2	0.12	39%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.09	33%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.06	23%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	25%	17 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.04	24%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.13	28%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	20%	16 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.07	35%	16 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.07	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.09	23%	16 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.01	26%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	15%	16 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	38%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	28%	16 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.04	12%	16 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	15%	16 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	30%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	32%	10 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	33%	10 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.03	42%	10 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	16%	10 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.03	44%	10 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	32%	10 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.01	39%	10 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.07	46%	10 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.04	39%	10 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.03	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	33%	10 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	45%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	33%	10 Jul →
cache	6–2	0.06	45%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	33%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	28%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	23%	3 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	23%	3 Jul →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price