jit — CS2 Stats

PH76561198070838013[U:1:110572285]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,219Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#7173 of 8109 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,434 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,434Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,434
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 66 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning57

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateWLLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9

Aggression6.0

Utility6.8

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.7

Utility6.8

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time546ms+2ms

first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms

Headshot accuracy22.1%+4.9%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	46	25–21	54%	0.04
inferno	A	17	10–7	59%	0.03
ancient	D	9	2–7	22%	0.03
cache	S	9	7–2	78%	0.03
anubis	S	9	7–2	78%	0.02
nuke	—	4	4–0	100%	0.02
dust2	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.03
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,574Matches

54%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

84.8ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	198	55%	1.27	17.1
Inferno	83	59%	1.27	18.3
Anubis	71	49%	1.21	18.1
Ancient	56	46%	1.08	16.4
Dust2	39	44%	1.16	15.8
Nuke	34	65%	1.30	17.4
Train	17	47%	1.08	17.4
Overpass	16	56%	1.36	18.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.2%Spray accuracy

83.2%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

533msReaction time

33.3%T opening success

39.4%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

9.6%Flash assists

7.08HE damage / grenade

10.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.2911% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–7	-0.01	25%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	18%	22 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.08	35%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	11%	18 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	33%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.08	11%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.00	22%	12 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.01	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	20%	6 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	27%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.10	31%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	19%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	16%	1 Aug →
mirage	2–13	0.09	24%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.08	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	27%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	10%	31 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	7%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	20%	26 Jul →
cache	0–3	-0.00	30%	26 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.05	33%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	13%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.08	20%	23 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.02	13%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	29%	21 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	20%	21 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	24%	20 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.05	24%	20 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.02	30%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.10	28%	20 Jul →
mirage	4–2	-0.00	22%	20 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	24%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	19%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.08	24%	19 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.11	22%	16 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.12	19%	15 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.03	23%	12 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.05	16%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.18	25%	11 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.00	15%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.15	21%	10 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.06	15%	10 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	14%	10 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.06	9%	10 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	0%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.19	16%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.07	20%	9 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.01	10%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	29%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.09	23%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	24%	9 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.13	19%	9 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	18%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	30%	9 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	34%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	15%	9 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	13%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	22%	8 Jul →
mirage	15–19	0.10	19%	8 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.00	23%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.06	23%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	25%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	7%	7 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	13%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.17	10%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	15%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	11%	2 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.03	15%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.01	22%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.05	11%	1 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.04	24%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	22%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.03	11%	28 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	20%	28 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	13%	26 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	17%	26 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	10%	25 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.06	16%	25 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	17%	25 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.02	19%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	17%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.24	14%	23 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.04	25%	23 Jun →
inferno	19–22	0.03	16%	23 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.05	16%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.08	15%	20 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	18%	20 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.01	27%	20 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	13%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.03	18%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.03	14%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.07	25%	19 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.02	13%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.11	17%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	17%	17 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.07	17%	17 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.00	25%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	19%	16 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.05	18%	16 Jun →