76561198068508687 — CS2 Stats

76561198068508687[U:1:108242959]

218Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning41
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48475Last 10048%Win rateLLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression3.3
Utility1.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.5

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.1
Utility1.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time581ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — mirage 13–5
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L7Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%-0.02
dust2A27151256%-0.01
infernoD1541127%-0.03
nukeB105550%-0.02
ancientS86275%-0.01
anubisC73443%-0.04
cache2020%0.00
overpass1010%-0.03
train1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
634msReaction time
24.2%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
1.51HE damage / grenade
0.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3266 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.172% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–80.000%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0612%12 Aug
cache10–130.0521%12 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0325%12 Aug
cache8–13-0.0413%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0225%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0818%31 Jul
dust213–9-0.0628%22 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0440%22 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0813%12 Jun
dust27–13-0.0130%12 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0328%12 Jun
dust213–7-0.0812%12 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0417%11 Jun
nuke16–12-0.0310%11 Jun
dust213–7-0.0222%11 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0330%11 Jun
anubis1–9-0.1050%10 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0426%10 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0315%10 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0530%9 Jun
dust215–150.0328%9 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0514%9 Jun
mirage13–1-0.058%9 Jun
nuke0–13-0.060%9 Jun
ancient13–00.000%9 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0010%9 Jun
mirage13–60.0524%9 Jun
mirage4–00.0250%9 Jun
dust211–13-0.0122%9 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0523%9 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0730%9 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0015%9 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0711%8 Jun
dust215–15-0.0222%8 Jun
mirage15–150.0317%8 Jun
mirage13–90.0313%3 Jun
dust213–90.0715%10 May
dust216–130.0215%10 May
mirage10–130.0215%28 Jan
mirage13–80.0313%28 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0413%27 Jan
ancient7–130.0010%27 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0520%20 Jan
mirage4–13-0.049%17 Jan
dust24–13-0.1021%17 Jan
ancient13–50.059%13 Jan
dust28–00.0511%13 Jan
dust213–100.0324%10 Jan
dust213–11-0.0225%10 Jan
mirage13–40.0420%10 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0113%16 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0517%6 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0421%6 Jul
anubis6–13-0.077%6 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0013%5 Jul
train7–13-0.0015%5 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0319%4 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0623%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0120%3 Jul
inferno3–13-0.076%3 Jul
dust212–12-0.0513%2 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0410%2 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0010%2 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0612%2 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0311%2 Jul
dust213–70.0224%1 Jul
nuke13–60.0119%1 Jul
dust213–11-0.0421%1 Jul
nuke11–130.0419%1 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0323%1 Jul
dust29–130.0113%30 Jun
dust213–90.0321%30 Jun
dust210–13-0.0017%30 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0514%29 Jun
ancient13–3-0.048%28 Jun
dust213–70.0527%28 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0311%28 Jun
inferno10–130.0219%28 Jun
mirage13–90.0220%28 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0121%28 Jun
dust29–13-0.0117%28 Jun
mirage8–130.0322%28 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0214%28 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0615%28 Jun
mirage13–50.0819%28 Jun
dust213–16-0.0120%28 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0132%28 Jun
dust213–10-0.0815%28 Jun
nuke13–100.0022%28 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0313%28 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0319%28 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0313%28 Jun
dust23–13-0.0914%28 Jun
mirage13–70.0220%28 Jun
anubis13–110.0415%28 Jun
dust213–60.0018%28 Jun
dust20–10-0.050%25 Jun
dust213–10-0.0218%21 Jun
inferno8–1-0.0222%19 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →