HeRmiiSs — CS2 Stats

76561198067994979[U:1:107729251]

2,312Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,915Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7124 of 29432 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHeRmiiSsFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,915 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning32
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateWWLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression3.9
Utility3.2
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning3.2
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time628ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms
Headshot accuracy27.1%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 26.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2011955%-0.03
dust2B179853%-0.01
infernoB179853%0.00
nukeA106460%-0.01
ancientB105550%-0.02
anubisC94544%-0.03
cacheB63350%0.01
vertigo440100%0.02
overpass3030%-0.04
train21150%-0.03
office21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

436Matches
56%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
102.7ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%1.5423.5
Mirage1100%2.0827.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
642msReaction time
24.4%T opening success
46.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
8.57HE damage / grenade
3.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1445° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4827 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–12-0.0322%29 Aug
cache13–7-0.0720%27 Aug
cache11–130.0225%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0228%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0683%23 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0127%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0815%20 Aug
dust213–70.0526%20 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0227%18 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0631%16 Aug
train12–12-0.0923%15 Aug
train13–70.0435%15 Aug
dust213–60.0633%15 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0624%12 Aug
nuke10–10.0039%12 Aug
dust213–10-0.0229%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0428%11 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0119%11 Aug
cache8–130.0717%8 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0137%8 Aug
dust213–100.0221%3 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0420%2 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0332%2 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0525%1 Aug
mirage16–140.0224%1 Aug
mirage4–130.0023%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0626%1 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0314%1 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0627%1 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0716%1 Aug
dust21–13-0.0623%1 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0133%1 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0224%1 Aug
dust23–13-0.059%29 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0725%29 Jul
ancient10–130.0211%29 Jul
mirage3–0-0.110%29 Jul
dust213–40.0222%29 Jul
dust213–80.1025%29 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0518%29 Jul
vertigo13–10-0.1020%29 Jul
vertigo4–10.1229%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.0419%28 Jul
dust213–70.0134%28 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0239%27 Jul
cache13–80.0033%27 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0623%27 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0123%27 Jul
dust213–7-0.0129%27 Jul
vertigo13–80.0922%27 Jul
anubis13–110.0623%22 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0625%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.0820%18 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0213%18 Jul
mirage13–00.0167%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0915%18 Jul
cache16–120.0330%17 Jul
inferno5–130.0124%17 Jul
nuke13–30.0926%17 Jul
inferno13–40.1331%16 Jul
inferno13–3-0.009%15 Jul
inferno11–130.0534%15 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0321%15 Jul
inferno13–30.0210%15 Jul
office11–13-0.0721%9 Jul
office13–20.0139%9 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0523%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.106%5 Jul
anubis5–13-0.1042%5 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0135%4 Jul
dust213–100.0242%4 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0827%4 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0427%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0639%4 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0136%4 Jul
mirage9–130.0221%2 Jul
ancient13–90.0525%2 Jul
overpass5–130.0120%2 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0243%2 Jul
inferno13–100.0128%2 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0133%1 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0224%1 Jul
cache3–130.0022%1 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0722%25 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0416%25 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0430%25 Jun
mirage2–130.0021%25 Jun
ancient2–0-0.0850%25 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0515%25 Jun
nuke11–130.0016%25 Jun
nuke13–60.0226%24 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0233%24 Jun
ancient16–140.0523%24 Jun
anubis9–130.0119%24 Jun
inferno13–50.0824%24 Jun
mirage13–50.0114%24 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0326%24 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0139%24 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0329%24 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0714%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →