Port of Miami — CS2 Stats

76561198063399519[U:1:103133791]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

382Tracked matches42%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.6 Learning

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45

Positioning38

Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–47–11Last 10042%Win rateTLLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5

Aggression2.4

Utility1.8

Positioning3.8

Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 701ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5

Positioning3.8

Utility1.8

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels0.3

Win Impact2.4

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time699ms+28ms

first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 699ms

Headshot accuracy15.4%−4.2%

first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–0Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 12nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	60	28–32	47%	-0.00
mirage	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.03
nuke	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.03
cache	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.03
anubis	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.01
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches

32%Win rate

0.94Avg K/D

—ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	4	50%	0.90	13.5
Vertigo	2	100%	1.38	17.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.64	9.0
Anubis	1	0%	0.88	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy

31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.1%Spray accuracy

77.4%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

701msReaction time

23.7%T opening success

32.2%CT opening success

0.44Enemies flashed / flash

2.7%Flash assists

2.34HE damage / grenade

1.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 701.282ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4433 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.6629% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	12–12	-0.03	20%	29 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.07	21%	28 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	19%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.03	27%	27 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	20%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	12%	18 Jun →
dust2	9–4	0.02	26%	18 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	10%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	10%	18 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	20%	17 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	18%	16 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.01	25%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.02	13%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.01	6%	15 Jun →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	13%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.00	19%	12 Jun →
anubis	12–12	0.01	13%	12 Jun →
nuke	12–12	-0.06	21%	11 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	9%	11 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	19%	11 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	14%	9 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.09	19%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.04	9%	9 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.06	15%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.10	7%	9 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	10%	8 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	5%	7 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	16%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	19%	7 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	14%	7 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.03	14%	3 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.06	13%	31 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	14%	31 May →
mirage	13–3	0.01	15%	31 May →
dust2	3–13	0.02	43%	29 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	16%	29 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	24%	29 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	28%	29 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	15%	27 May →
cache	13–8	-0.05	27%	27 May →
cache	13–10	-0.01	21%	27 May →
anubis	13–7	-0.09	7%	25 May →
dust2	13–2	0.09	22%	25 May →
cache	12–12	-0.01	27%	25 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	19%	25 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	13%	25 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	18%	23 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	11%	23 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	16%	23 May →
cache	13–8	0.01	29%	22 May →
dust2	13–3	0.03	8%	22 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	13%	22 May →
nuke	13–0	-0.02	15%	22 May →
dust2	13–8	0.06	16%	21 May →
dust2	13–6	0.03	7%	21 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	22%	21 May →
dust2	13–7	0.05	21%	20 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	11%	20 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	20%	20 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	8%	19 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	7%	19 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	15%	19 May →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	16%	14 May →
dust2	9–0	0.01	3%	14 May →
dust2	11–13	0.06	11%	14 May →
cache	6–13	-0.12	10%	14 May →
dust2	13–3	0.04	15%	14 May →
cache	5–13	-0.00	19%	14 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.10	18%	12 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	23%	12 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	10%	12 May →
dust2	3–10	-0.06	25%	12 May →
dust2	13–4	0.01	18%	12 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.10	8%	10 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	12%	6 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	27%	6 May →
cache	2–13	-0.09	27%	6 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	22%	6 May →
nuke	12–12	-0.08	17%	6 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	15%	6 May →
dust2	6–13	0.02	19%	6 May →
dust2	9–13	0.02	20%	6 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	19%	20 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	24%	11 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	25%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.05	17%	2 Oct →
mirage	13–2	0.00	10%	2 Oct →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	13%	6 Apr →
dust2	6–13	0.05	22%	6 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.09	22%	6 Apr →
vertigo	7–13	-0.03	18%	22 Mar →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	12%	22 Mar →
nuke	8–10	-0.04	13%	20 Mar →
dust2	13–3	0.15	16%	15 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.06	27%	14 Mar →
vertigo	11–13	0.06	25%	9 Mar →
dust2	3–12	-0.01	21%	9 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.06	22%	9 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.10	30%	3 Mar →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	28%	25 Feb →