Darx — CS2 Stats

PL76561198061679259[U:1:101413531]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,967Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,223 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning55

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateWWLWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7

Aggression5.9

Utility5.2

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning5.5

Utility5.2

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time599ms−7ms

first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms

Headshot accuracy18.2%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — vertigo 9–5

13–1Biggest win — train

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

3–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	23	9–14	39%	-0.01
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.02
mirage	S	17	12–5	71%	0.01
inferno	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.00
vertigo	S	9	7–2	78%	0.04
nuke	D	8	2–6	25%	0.02
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
dust2	—	2	2–0	100%	0.02
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,191Matches

50%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

79.7ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	806	55%	1.12	16.8
Anubis	469	50%	1.04	16.0
Ancient	413	48%	1.06	16.6
Inferno	264	51%	1.06	16.2
Nuke	148	45%	0.99	15.8
Dust2	121	40%	0.94	15.0
Train	92	50%	1.18	17.6
Vertigo	66	48%	0.95	15.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy

41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.0%Spray accuracy

80.3%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

593msReaction time

28.0%T opening success

52.0%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

8.2%Flash assists

8.18HE damage / grenade

9.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.9671% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–4	0.08	18%	23 Aug →
anubis	16–12	0.04	18%	23 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	14%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.04	20%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.01	14%	14 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.08	10%	8 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	15%	5 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	7%	3 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	9%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	11%	2 Aug →
anubis	16–13	-0.04	13%	1 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	0.00	30%	31 Jul →
train	13–1	0.09	37%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	26%	24 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	21%	24 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	0.16	8%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.02	18%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	24%	19 Jul →
cache	4–8	0.05	28%	19 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.05	9%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.02	19%	16 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	17%	16 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	15%	12 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	18%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	10%	9 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	19%	4 Jul →
inferno	6–9	-0.01	28%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.06	17%	2 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	31%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.02	15%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.01	17%	23 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	27%	16 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.02	13%	14 Jun →
cache	14–16	0.00	11%	14 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	13%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.10	20%	13 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.03	16%	12 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	-0.06	17%	12 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.01	16%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.02	20%	11 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.02	22%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.02	13%	10 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	9%	10 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.01	17%	7 Jun →
vertigo	13–6	-0.01	30%	7 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.00	18%	5 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.08	19%	5 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.01	20%	5 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.05	30%	4 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.02	13%	4 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	17%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–16	-0.04	9%	3 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	15%	2 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.06	16%	31 May →
ancient	3–13	-0.14	9%	31 May →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	18%	31 May →
cache	8–13	-0.06	23%	29 May →
overpass	16–14	-0.01	14%	28 May →
mirage	13–4	0.11	27%	27 May →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	14%	26 May →
mirage	13–2	-0.02	3%	23 May →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	23%	23 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	7%	22 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	14%	21 May →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	22%	16 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	13%	16 May →
nuke	8–13	0.08	25%	16 May →
ancient	13–10	0.02	16%	16 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.06	23%	15 May →
mirage	7–13	0.05	18%	15 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	10%	15 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	8%	15 May →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	18%	15 May →
ancient	13–2	-0.01	17%	15 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	20%	14 May →
anubis	13–6	-0.09	6%	13 May →
inferno	16–12	0.07	22%	11 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	23%	10 May →
cache	8–13	-0.03	23%	10 May →
cache	13–8	0.00	12%	10 May →
vertigo	7–9	-0.01	26%	10 May →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	25%	10 May →
vertigo	9–5	0.21	23%	8 May →
ancient	13–10	0.04	10%	7 May →
cache	13–4	0.07	14%	6 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	14%	6 May →
dust2	13–5	0.00	29%	4 May →
nuke	11–13	0.08	20%	4 May →
inferno	13–3	0.10	29%	4 May →
dust2	13–7	0.05	15%	4 May →
ancient	13–9	-0.06	13%	2 May →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	13%	2 May →
anubis	8–13	0.01	29%	2 May →
cache	12–12	-0.03	2%	30 Apr →
cache	13–8	0.00	22%	29 Apr →
mirage	16–13	0.02	17%	28 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.01	15%	28 Apr →
vertigo	13–7	-0.01	18%	20 Apr →
sanctum	8–8	-0.00	20%	18 Apr →