OG Arvy — CS2 Stats

76561198060762872[U:1:100497144]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,051Tracked matches63%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,317Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8856 of 25683 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning54

Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–41–6Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression6.9

Utility6.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.4

Utility6.9

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact9.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time590ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms

Headshot accuracy16.4%+0.5%

first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–6

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	27	12–15	44%	0.02
inferno	S	19	13–6	68%	0.04
dust2	C	14	5–9	36%	0.02
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	0.02
anubis	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.00
ancient	S	8	6–2	75%	0.02
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
office	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

102Matches

47%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

75.0ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	22	64%	1.09	15.0
Ancient	21	52%	0.92	12.9
Anubis	20	55%	1.39	16.2
Mirage	17	29%	1.04	16.0
Vertigo	8	38%	1.02	16.0
Nuke	7	43%	1.07	16.0
Dust2	6	17%	0.92	17.5
Train	1	0%	0.71	12.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy

41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.0%Spray accuracy

84.2%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

589msReaction time

37.6%T opening success

42.9%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

7.4%Flash assists

14.30HE damage / grenade

13.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.6189% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	6–13	-0.00	18%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.19	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	14%	12 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	15%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.00	13%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.07	9%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	9%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	10%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–3	0.18	15%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	16%	11 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	17%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.05	22%	7 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.01	21%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	19%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.11	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.11	20%	7 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	24%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	8%	7 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	21%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	19%	5 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.08	25%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.07	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	6%	3 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.03	14%	3 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	22%	3 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	12%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	20%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.06	11%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	15%	1 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.05	21%	1 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	15%	30 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	20%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	8%	28 Jul →
overpass	13–2	0.10	16%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.11	18%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.08	8%	28 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	10–2	0.06	15%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.01	16%	28 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.01	18%	28 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.01	16%	28 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.02	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	23%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	17%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.09	18%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	7%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	11%	26 Jul →
inferno	2–11	-0.02	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.10	16%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	27%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.08	10%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.06	17%	24 Jul →
office	13–11	0.03	13%	23 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.13	21%	23 Jul →
office	13–10	0.06	23%	23 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.05	22%	23 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	24%	23 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	17%	21 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	13%	21 Jul →
mirage	7–0	-0.00	13%	21 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.00	11%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	14%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	10%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	8%	18 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.04	12%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	8%	18 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	3%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	8%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	18%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.01	11%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.10	15%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	17%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.03	14%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	14%	16 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	10%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	10%	15 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	17%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	11%	13 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	20%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.00	14%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	15%	12 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	19%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	12%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	23%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	13%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	14%	11 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	21%	11 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	14%	11 Jul →
ancient	3–13	0.04	31%	11 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.03	27%	11 Jul →
inferno	2–13	0.01	16%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.04	18%	11 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.02	16%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	16%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.09	11%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	31%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.02	14%	10 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.00	15%	6 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	12%	6 Jul →