schwarzebub — CS2 Stats

76561198060465484[U:1:100199756]

2,340Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGschwarzebubFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning60
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52435Last 10052%Win rateWWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression8.1
Utility3.4
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.0
Utility3.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time500ms−97ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 500ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — inferno 9–3
130Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
W4Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 59% over 22anubisWeakest map · 45% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA22121055%0.00
infernoA2213959%0.03
anubisB2091145%-0.01
nukeB126650%0.00
overpassA116555%0.01
vertigoB63350%0.01
poseidon42250%-0.01
mirage21150%-0.01
ancient1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

919Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
75.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1464%0.9816.4
Cache1050%0.9714.7
Nuke967%1.1414.3
Inferno875%1.4017.4
Vertigo475%0.9815.3
Mirage333%0.9113.3
Overpass333%0.9819.0
Ancient1100%0.8815.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
483msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
0.6%Flash assists
11.06HE damage / grenade
2.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.8607 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0791% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.0321%26 Aug
cache13–40.0621%26 Aug
inferno13–100.0722%26 Aug
nuke13–50.1023%25 Aug
anubis17–190.0628%25 Aug
vertigo13–90.0313%24 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0220%20 Aug
inferno13–80.0323%19 Aug
inferno13–60.0829%19 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0231%19 Aug
anubis19–16-0.0432%16 Aug
anubis10–130.0118%16 Aug
cache11–130.0331%12 Aug
inferno13–40.0638%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0215%12 Aug
nuke13–80.0112%11 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0418%11 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0225%10 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0133%10 Aug
cache9–13-0.0530%8 Aug
anubis4–13-0.1018%8 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0316%5 Aug
cache13–40.0937%5 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0617%5 Aug
cache16–130.0732%28 Jul
nuke10–130.0527%24 Jul
anubis13–30.0121%24 Jul
cache13–10-0.0322%24 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0316%22 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0119%22 Jul
anubis10–130.0220%22 Jul
anubis12–160.0020%15 Jul
cache13–7-0.0431%15 Jul
cache15–15-0.0017%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0129%1 Jul
cache13–8-0.0217%1 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0539%1 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0220%27 Jun
inferno8–80.0135%27 Jun
inferno6–9-0.0129%27 Jun
inferno9–40.1037%27 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0615%26 Jun
cache13–8-0.0527%26 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0126%26 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0119%26 Jun
inferno16–130.0526%25 Jun
inferno9–4-0.0335%24 Jun
cache13–50.0425%22 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0422%22 Jun
anubis13–100.0316%18 Jun
cache13–16-0.0127%18 Jun
cache13–80.0130%17 Jun
overpass6–13-0.099%17 Jun
cache12–120.0031%7 Jun
cache13–00.0627%7 Jun
anubis12–16-0.0619%7 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0414%6 Jun
anubis13–70.0320%6 Jun
nuke0–2-0.030%6 Jun
overpass13–110.0219%6 Jun
inferno16–120.0325%5 Jun
cache7–13-0.0221%4 Jun
poseidon6–9-0.0532%31 May
inferno9–30.2736%31 May
anubis13–50.0415%26 May
anubis7–13-0.0514%26 May
nuke13–110.0419%25 May
overpass13–110.0326%25 May
inferno5–13-0.0420%25 May
overpass3–13-0.0212%24 May
anubis9–130.0118%24 May
overpass6–13-0.0419%21 May
poseidon3–9-0.1430%21 May
inferno13–10-0.0231%18 May
nuke16–14-0.029%18 May
anubis16–13-0.0331%11 May
nuke10–130.0113%11 May
vertigo3–9-0.0836%9 May
overpass8–80.0216%9 May
inferno9–50.1628%9 May
poseidon9–60.0924%9 May
overpass9–50.0928%8 May
vertigo9–40.2241%8 May
inferno5–9-0.0019%8 May
overpass9–10.1517%8 May
poseidon9–50.0742%8 May
inferno2–9-0.1621%8 May
vertigo8–8-0.0547%8 May
cache6–13-0.0718%6 May
cache13–20.0536%6 May
cache13–60.0623%6 May
overpass11–13-0.0124%4 May
cache11–130.0023%4 May
cache6–13-0.0823%4 May
anubis13–110.0324%27 Apr
inferno13–60.0330%27 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0326%26 Apr
inferno9–130.0320%26 Apr
ancient10–130.0517%26 Apr
overpass13–50.0116%23 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →