pr1M — CS2 Stats

76561198058836750[U:1:98571022]

1,429Tracked matches39%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,540 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpr1MFACEITLevel 7 · 1,540 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning42
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateTLWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression3.0
Utility5.9
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time627ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — anubis 2–0
131Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24121250%-0.01
mirageC23101343%-0.02
ancientS1510567%-0.00
anubisA117464%0.01
cacheC94544%-0.01
nukeB84450%-0.04
infernoS64267%-0.01
overpass42250%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

367Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
79.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210457%1.2417.3
Mirage5343%1.1115.2
Ancient4161%1.1316.1
Nuke3845%1.0616.3
Anubis3754%1.2016.3
Inferno2040%1.0816.0
Train1275%1.1116.7
Overpass1242%1.1515.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
617msReaction time
19.4%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
9.93HE damage / grenade
6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.3966% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0119%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0433%4 Aug
nuke16–140.0230%3 Aug
cache4–13-0.0432%20 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0631%20 Jul
ancient10–10.0225%20 Jul
cache2–13-0.0321%18 Jul
mirage16–19-0.058%16 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0127%15 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0212%13 Jul
cache13–20.028%13 Jul
ancient13–70.0420%13 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0216%13 Jul
dust27–13-0.0821%13 Jul
cache6–13-0.0517%11 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0623%11 Jul
mirage9–13-0.073%11 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0518%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0115%11 Jul
inferno13–70.0625%11 Jul
cache10–130.0219%11 Jul
dust213–8-0.0131%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.079%11 Jul
mirage13–50.0217%11 Jul
dust27–13-0.0241%11 Jul
anubis9–130.0133%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0516%10 Jul
cache1–13-0.1013%10 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0715%10 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0514%10 Jul
dust213–2-0.059%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0321%10 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0222%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0513%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0429%9 Jul
cache13–100.0114%9 Jul
dust213–6-0.029%9 Jul
cache13–60.0519%9 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0220%8 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0217%8 Jul
cache13–60.0217%7 Jul
mirage13–60.0424%6 Jul
ancient8–13-0.019%6 Jul
dust29–130.0419%5 Jul
dust29–13-0.0418%29 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0414%28 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0724%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0629%28 Jun
mirage13–9-0.028%28 Jun
dust216–12-0.0129%28 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0415%27 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0019%27 Jun
dust216–140.0332%27 Jun
anubis2–00.2340%27 Jun
anubis13–30.0725%27 Jun
ancient13–40.0319%27 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0138%27 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0314%27 Jun
dust26–13-0.0117%21 Jun
dust210–130.0230%21 Jun
mirage13–100.0625%20 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0218%19 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0117%16 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0318%14 Jun
dust211–13-0.049%14 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0018%11 Jun
mirage15–15-0.009%11 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0810%10 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0113%10 Jun
dust211–13-0.0710%10 Jun
dust213–9-0.0119%10 Jun
nuke9–13-0.048%10 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0417%10 Jun
dust210–130.0216%9 Jun
dust213–100.0814%9 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0613%9 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0220%8 Jun
overpass3–13-0.1126%8 Jun
dust213–100.0227%8 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0222%8 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0324%7 Jun
dust213–70.0423%7 Jun
anubis13–100.0323%7 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0528%6 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0622%6 Jun
ancient13–90.0419%6 Jun
anubis13–90.0029%6 Jun
mirage13–100.0225%6 Jun
dust213–10-0.0715%6 Jun
mirage13–50.0236%6 Jun
inferno13–110.0129%6 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0718%6 Jun
dust213–90.0415%6 Jun
ancient13–100.0317%4 Jun
overpass13–16-0.0114%4 Jun
nuke13–70.0336%2 Jun
ancient13–50.0817%1 Jun
dust29–13-0.0219%1 Jun
anubis13–90.0025%26 May
dust213–9-0.0121%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →