-turas — CS2 Stats

76561198058515201[U:1:98249473]✓ No bans

931Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,545 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-turasFACEITLevel 7 · 1,545 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4951Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression4.6
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time633ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — mirage 13–4
132Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17dust2Weakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26121446%-0.02
dust2C2281436%-0.03
infernoS1711665%-0.03
anubisB168850%-0.03
nukeC73443%-0.03
overpassA53260%-0.00
cache440100%-0.01
ancient3030%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,609Matches
50%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
67.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12150%0.8113.3
Inferno11160%0.8813.4
Anubis10953%0.7913.6
Dust210244%0.7612.0
Nuke4353%0.7512.4
Ancient3546%0.7411.4
Train3155%0.7613.0
Overpass1346%0.7613.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
626msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
4.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4399 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9118% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.0326%28 Jul
anubis13–10-0.038%18 Jul
cache13–4-0.0123%18 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0717%24 Jun
dust22–13-0.0730%24 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0216%12 Jun
dust25–13-0.0818%12 Jun
ancient4–13-0.046%3 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0217%29 May
inferno7–13-0.0616%29 May
inferno13–8-0.0418%29 May
overpass14–16-0.0214%27 May
dust213–2-0.0027%27 May
inferno13–90.0521%27 May
cache13–40.0114%19 May
anubis7–13-0.084%19 May
mirage7–13-0.0615%18 May
inferno13–9-0.018%18 May
inferno13–10-0.009%12 May
mirage13–7-0.0311%12 May
dust27–13-0.0426%12 May
cache13–11-0.0214%12 May
cache13–3-0.0132%9 May
anubis4–13-0.0216%24 Apr
inferno13–90.0117%22 Apr
mirage13–80.0117%22 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0214%22 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0717%21 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0730%21 Apr
inferno13–80.0030%21 Apr
dust213–30.0125%21 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0624%20 Apr
dust29–13-0.0340%20 Apr
mirage8–130.0433%20 Apr
mirage13–80.0719%19 Apr
dust29–130.0527%19 Apr
anubis13–80.0127%17 Apr
dust28–13-0.0514%17 Apr
overpass13–30.012%17 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0219%17 Apr
dust20–13-0.0812%12 Apr
inferno20–22-0.0416%12 Apr
anubis13–70.0328%12 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0917%11 Apr
mirage13–70.0214%11 Apr
dust24–13-0.0225%11 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0410%11 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0232%11 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0613%11 Apr
mirage2–13-0.1136%11 Apr
anubis9–13-0.067%11 Apr
dust213–7-0.0724%11 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0119%11 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0011%10 Apr
dust216–19-0.0314%8 Apr
dust28–13-0.0417%8 Apr
anubis8–130.0315%1 Apr
nuke9–130.008%1 Apr
dust28–13-0.0719%1 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0415%1 Apr
dust213–8-0.0327%1 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0720%1 Apr
inferno16–13-0.0019%27 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0514%27 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0426%27 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0318%27 Mar
dust213–8-0.0028%27 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0213%27 Mar
dust27–13-0.0429%23 Mar
dust213–8-0.0321%23 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0316%23 Mar
dust28–13-0.0914%23 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0524%23 Mar
nuke16–190.0016%18 Mar
mirage30–340.0218%18 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0516%18 Mar
dust219–16-0.0031%11 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0628%11 Mar
overpass13–100.0524%11 Mar
dust211–130.0121%3 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0410%3 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0420%3 Mar
mirage16–19-0.0321%1 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0013%28 Feb
inferno9–13-0.076%28 Feb
mirage13–40.0932%28 Feb
nuke13–5-0.0414%28 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0945%28 Feb
anubis13–7-0.075%28 Feb
dust213–6-0.0214%28 Feb
mirage2–130.0110%28 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0114%28 Feb
inferno13–80.0230%28 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0425%28 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0320%23 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0721%23 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0917%11 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0121%11 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0218%11 Feb
mirage13–10-0.049%10 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →