666 MÆDÆ

666 MÆDÆ — CS2 Stats

GB76561198058242767[U:1:97977039]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,777Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating11,931Blue band · top ~44.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36663 of 53486 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG666 MÆDÆFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,931 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning48
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42499Last 10042%Win rateLLWWLTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8
Aggression5.5
Utility2.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 685ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.8
Utility2.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time687ms+69ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 687ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 13–6
121Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
38In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB24131154%0.03
dust2D123925%-0.03
anubisD1221017%0.01
infernoC125742%0.02
vertigoD93633%0.02
mirageC94544%0.01
cacheA85363%0.02
trainB84450%0.02
ancient21150%-0.04
overpass220100%0.01
shelter1010%0.00
alpine1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

212Matches
53%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
81.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2564%1.3719.5
Vertigo2450%1.3520.9
Nuke1771%1.3117.5
Inferno1533%1.0416.9
Mirage1471%1.6018.4
Overpass540%0.9316.8
Ancient425%1.0817.3
Dust2425%1.1418.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
13.1°Preaim
685msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
5.80HE damage / grenade
2.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.0568° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8827% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3565 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust20–13-0.078%18 Jul
shelter4–130.0020%18 Jul
nuke13–90.1520%17 Jun
anubis13–100.1419%17 Jun
nuke1–13-0.076%17 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0219%2 May
cache13–70.0216%2 May
cache13–8-0.0113%2 May
cache13–8-0.0113%2 May
cache8–13-0.0319%30 Apr
cache13–70.0625%30 Apr
cache13–90.0612%30 Apr
cache11–130.0612%30 Apr
cache10–13-0.007%29 Apr
inferno12–120.0111%7 Mar
nuke8–130.1118%7 Mar
vertigo6–130.0625%3 Mar
nuke6–130.1120%3 Mar
dust211–13-0.0512%27 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0316%26 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0020%26 Feb
nuke8–130.0212%26 Feb
nuke5–13-0.073%20 Feb
anubis8–130.0612%20 Feb
nuke12–10.1413%16 Feb
vertigo13–10-0.0217%16 Feb
anubis11–130.0415%16 Feb
dust25–13-0.0315%15 Feb
nuke13–40.0915%15 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0611%15 Feb
vertigo9–130.0018%15 Feb
dust213–6-0.068%11 Feb
mirage11–130.0116%11 Feb
anubis12–12-0.0214%8 Feb
inferno9–130.0226%8 Feb
dust211–13-0.0212%4 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0121%4 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0018%31 Jan
dust29–130.0413%31 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0212%31 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0017%31 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0510%31 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0215%29 Jan
mirage13–80.0620%29 Jan
dust23–13-0.0621%25 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0710%25 Jan
nuke13–70.1119%25 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0414%25 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0112%25 Jan
anubis12–160.008%25 Jan
overpass13–110.0016%24 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0419%24 Jan
dust212–12-0.0218%24 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0116%24 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0212%24 Jan
anubis6–13-0.059%24 Jan
nuke13–80.0622%24 Jan
inferno13–60.2113%24 Jan
mirage13–100.0519%24 Jan
alpine1–13-0.0522%24 Jan
train2–13-0.023%24 Jan
dust29–13-0.0713%23 Jan
nuke16–13-0.0220%23 Jan
dust213–4-0.015%23 Jan
mirage9–130.0213%23 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0119%23 Jan
dust213–30.0811%23 Jan
mirage13–50.0515%23 Jan
nuke13–100.0410%23 Jan
nuke3–13-0.088%23 Jan
nuke13–100.0430%11 Dec
vertigo13–110.0119%11 Dec
anubis9–13-0.0215%7 Dec
overpass13–70.0219%7 Dec
inferno13–40.0218%7 Dec
nuke13–50.0716%7 Dec
nuke13–100.0016%6 Dec
train8–130.0714%6 Dec
inferno12–120.0720%26 Nov
nuke12–120.0624%26 Nov
train8–13-0.0317%26 Nov
ancient10–13-0.078%26 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0220%21 Nov
train13–50.098%21 Nov
vertigo6–13-0.0215%15 Nov
inferno13–50.0419%15 Nov
train2–13-0.0618%8 Nov
nuke12–120.0219%8 Nov
vertigo8–130.0525%8 Nov
anubis12–120.1016%8 Nov
dust211–13-0.0523%8 Nov
train13–60.0218%7 Nov
inferno12–12-0.0215%7 Nov
vertigo13–60.0413%6 Nov
nuke13–50.0419%6 Nov
train13–40.0117%2 Nov
train13–110.0611%28 Oct
anubis3–13-0.0113%28 Oct
vertigo3–100.019%28 Oct
vertigo8–13-0.005%28 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →