BackLan — CS2 Stats

76561198056567275[U:1:96301547]

890Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBackLanFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning56
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateLWLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8
Aggression7.2
Utility3.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.6
Utility3.8
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time649ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 13–7
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
1112In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%-0.00
cacheB157847%0.01
infernoC135838%-0.02
nukeB115645%0.03
anubisS118373%0.03
dust2C104640%-0.01
ancientC83538%-0.01
overpass32167%0.04
vertigo110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

293Matches
50%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
88.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7152%1.1417.1
Anubis4646%1.1518.4
Cache3546%1.1717.7
Nuke3549%1.2619.0
Inferno3352%1.0416.4
Ancient3342%1.1118.4
Dust22241%1.0116.9
Overpass1173%1.5522.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
640msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.55HE damage / grenade
3.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4318 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4786% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–7-0.0820%26 Aug
cache13–9-0.0323%23 Aug
nuke9–130.0116%19 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0217%19 Aug
cache13–50.1131%19 Aug
nuke13–90.0419%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0225%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0215%16 Aug
nuke3–130.0121%16 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0116%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0222%15 Aug
dust29–130.0518%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0411%15 Aug
anubis13–100.0718%15 Aug
cache13–50.0531%13 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0121%12 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0232%9 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0110%8 Aug
mirage7–80.0722%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0820%8 Aug
mirage5–130.0126%8 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0319%8 Aug
mirage9–130.0130%7 Aug
vertigo13–50.1019%7 Aug
nuke8–130.0314%7 Aug
cache12–16-0.0117%6 Aug
nuke19–16-0.018%5 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0227%5 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0416%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0912%4 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0218%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0223%2 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0419%2 Aug
mirage13–50.0817%1 Aug
dust21–13-0.0811%25 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0326%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0125%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0126%24 Jul
ancient13–110.0316%24 Jul
nuke13–50.1318%24 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0416%16 Jul
ancient11–130.0022%14 Jul
cache13–40.0214%14 Jul
mirage13–10.028%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0513%10 Jul
mirage13–90.044%9 Jul
dust27–13-0.0115%8 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0318%8 Jul
cache13–50.0710%8 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0320%7 Jul
mirage13–60.0318%7 Jul
dust210–130.0114%6 Jul
cache9–13-0.0517%6 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0316%6 Jul
ancient11–130.0412%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0620%5 Jul
inferno8–13-0.028%4 Jul
anubis13–40.0422%3 Jul
dust213–11-0.0019%3 Jul
mirage13–80.0012%1 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0126%1 Jul
anubis13–70.1316%29 Jun
cache10–130.0122%29 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0115%28 Jun
anubis25–220.0118%28 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0217%27 Jun
anubis13–110.0723%26 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0521%26 Jun
inferno13–8-0.049%16 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0410%16 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0014%16 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0422%15 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0412%12 Jun
overpass19–170.0713%12 Jun
dust213–110.0113%11 Jun
overpass13–60.0913%11 Jun
cache5–130.0216%10 Jun
mirage11–13-0.066%10 Jun
dust213–5-0.0315%10 Jun
inferno8–130.0414%9 Jun
mirage13–20.0226%9 Jun
inferno2–13-0.1110%9 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0210%8 Jun
cache7–130.0121%8 Jun
cache7–130.0113%7 Jun
mirage8–130.0319%7 Jun
anubis13–80.0616%6 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0717%6 Jun
mirage10–130.0716%6 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0914%5 Jun
cache13–10-0.0210%5 Jun
cache13–90.0415%4 Jun
inferno11–130.0216%4 Jun
nuke13–70.1724%3 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0021%3 Jun
dust213–6-0.0016%3 Jun
cache6–13-0.0117%2 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0813%2 Jun
inferno13–40.0623%2 Jun
anubis13–70.0215%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →