CopO

CopO — CS2 Stats

76561198053695908[U:1:93430180]Steam profile ↗

971Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,225 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCopOFACEITLevel 7 · 1,225 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning46
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58393Last 10058%Win rateWLLWWLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression6.1
Utility5.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time592ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 13–1
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 16ancientWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A31171455%-0.01
anubisA2213959%-0.00
ancientC1881044%-0.02
infernoS1612475%0.02
cacheA74357%0.01
mirage32167%-0.02
nuke21150%-0.00
office110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

136Matches
58%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
74.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24058%1.1813.9
Inferno2462%1.6214.6
Anubis2352%1.0614.3
Ancient1650%0.9413.0
Mirage862%0.9812.4
Nuke367%1.1314.0
Vertigo2100%1.0417.0
Overpass2100%1.3417.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
581msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
6.99HE damage / grenade
7.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4664 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.783% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0227%21 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0115%21 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0621%21 Jul
dust213–40.0223%17 Jul
inferno13–30.0810%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0313%17 Jul
mirage13–80.0419%16 Jul
inferno13–70.0620%16 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0414%16 Jul
cache12–12-0.0015%16 Jul
anubis13–80.0414%13 Jul
anubis13–100.0021%8 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0120%8 Jul
dust213–10.1016%8 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0114%4 Jul
inferno11–130.1019%2 Jul
dust29–13-0.0714%2 Jul
anubis13–110.0518%1 Jul
inferno13–110.0215%1 Jul
dust23–13-0.1010%1 Jul
anubis11–130.0014%1 Jul
cache13–50.049%30 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0213%30 Jun
anubis13–40.0311%30 Jun
inferno13–70.0110%29 Jun
dust27–130.0122%29 Jun
anubis13–4-0.0020%29 Jun
mirage13–5-0.096%26 Jun
dust24–13-0.0717%26 Jun
inferno13–20.105%26 Jun
inferno13–40.0910%25 Jun
dust213–8-0.0016%25 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0113%24 Jun
anubis16–130.0014%24 Jun
dust213–7-0.0835%24 Jun
cache0–11-0.0815%24 Jun
dust29–13-0.0116%21 Jun
anubis13–80.0011%18 Jun
ancient13–70.0214%18 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0515%18 Jun
cache13–11-0.049%18 Jun
dust213–80.0116%17 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0211%17 Jun
dust213–30.0414%17 Jun
ancient13–3-0.049%17 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0717%17 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0211%15 Jun
dust213–60.0718%15 Jun
anubis9–13-0.102%15 Jun
dust29–13-0.0121%15 Jun
cache12–120.0415%14 Jun
dust213–60.0612%14 Jun
dust25–13-0.0312%14 Jun
ancient6–13-0.059%14 Jun
office13–30.049%11 Jun
cache13–100.0113%11 Jun
inferno4–13-0.079%11 Jun
anubis3–13-0.085%11 Jun
inferno13–50.0121%11 Jun
ancient9–13-0.078%11 Jun
inferno13–5-0.035%10 Jun
ancient13–10-0.039%10 Jun
dust213–100.0220%10 Jun
ancient7–13-0.065%10 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0012%9 Jun
dust213–8-0.012%9 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0119%9 Jun
dust27–13-0.0315%9 Jun
dust213–90.0225%8 Jun
dust24–13-0.0023%4 Jun
anubis19–150.0218%4 Jun
dust213–9-0.0416%4 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0615%4 Jun
ancient11–13-0.015%3 Jun
dust213–4-0.0121%3 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0221%1 Jun
ancient9–130.009%1 Jun
dust28–13-0.0011%1 Jun
dust29–13-0.095%27 May
ancient0–13-0.0412%27 May
anubis6–130.0213%26 May
anubis13–8-0.0011%26 May
dust213–80.0519%26 May
anubis5–13-0.0220%25 May
dust213–7-0.0012%25 May
ancient3–13-0.0412%25 May
anubis13–60.046%21 May
ancient13–40.028%21 May
dust213–50.0114%21 May
inferno13–90.0016%20 May
dust29–13-0.0715%20 May
dust213–60.0420%19 May
mirage14–16-0.0121%18 May
anubis13–50.049%18 May
ancient13–40.0418%18 May
anubis13–90.0210%15 May
inferno13–100.019%15 May
ancient13–30.109%15 May
cache13–60.0919%15 May
dust212–120.0415%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →