game sense and verve — CS2 Stats

76561198049747086[U:1:89481358]

131Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,810Purple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning63

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3

Aggression8.8

Utility4.1

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.1

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning6.3

Utility4.1

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time640ms−74ms

first ⅓ avg 714ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms

Headshot accuracy18.4%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 16dust2Weakest map · 27% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	22	6–16	27%	-0.00
nuke	S	16	12–4	75%	0.02
mirage	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.01
inferno	S	12	9–3	75%	0.01
ancient	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.01
anubis	S	9	6–3	67%	0.02
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
grail	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
brewery	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches

65%Win rate

1.42Avg K/D

—ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy

35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.8%Spray accuracy

82.8%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

641msReaction time

31.3%T opening success

61.4%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

3.1%Flash assists

7.25HE damage / grenade

7.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4787 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.3281% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	9–13	-0.04	18%	20 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.06	28%	20 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	12%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	18%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.01	24%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.02	30%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	19%	17 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	11%	31 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	15%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	20%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.06	20%	29 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	17%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	25%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	22%	28 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.09	22%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.06	10%	27 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.05	15%	27 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.00	14%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.09	17%	23 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	15%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	27%	19 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.00	20%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.06	23%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	9%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.04	18%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.09	29%	9 Jul →
overpass	13–4	0.07	19%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	22%	3 Jul →
overpass	13–5	0.02	17%	3 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.02	15%	30 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	8%	24 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	15%	23 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	13%	23 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.06	23%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	5%	22 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.04	13%	18 Jun →
inferno	16–13	-0.02	21%	16 Jun →
overpass	10–13	0.01	18%	16 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.00	15%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.02	24%	28 May →
ancient	16–13	0.00	13%	22 May →
cache	13–6	0.15	11%	8 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	18%	7 May →
nuke	13–6	0.06	15%	5 May →
anubis	13–1	0.10	8%	5 May →
nuke	13–6	0.11	25%	1 May →
cache	13–2	-0.04	15%	1 May →
cache	7–13	-0.07	11%	30 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.05	18%	28 Apr →
nuke	13–6	0.10	25%	28 Apr →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	17%	25 Apr →
ancient	7–13	0.01	14%	21 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	16%	7 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	14%	19 Mar →
overpass	13–4	-0.02	20%	12 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.03	23%	11 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.03	23%	23 Feb →
inferno	14–16	-0.04	15%	22 Feb →
dust2	13–9	0.04	22%	10 Feb →
anubis	13–2	0.06	19%	9 Feb →
ancient	13–10	0.04	11%	9 Feb →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	12%	4 Feb →
mirage	6–13	0.00	19%	3 Feb →
inferno	13–3	0.03	19%	3 Feb →
nuke	16–13	0.07	33%	1 Feb →
dust2	13–1	0.08	15%	1 Feb →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	7%	1 Feb →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	21%	31 Jan →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	22%	30 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	20%	30 Jan →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	14%	30 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	20%	22 Jan →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	15%	13 Jan →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	30%	10 Dec →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	19%	28 Nov →
nuke	16–12	0.00	21%	19 Nov →
mirage	3–13	-0.10	18%	17 Nov →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	18%	17 Nov →
overpass	8–13	-0.06	18%	23 Sept →
grail	5–13	-0.05	33%	13 Sept →
ancient	1–8	-0.05	18%	13 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.03	18%	17 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	19%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	13%	4 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.10	16%	3 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	17%	2 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	17%	2 Jun →
nuke	8–8	0.01	16%	14 May →
brewery	7–9	-0.02	29%	14 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	17%	14 May →
anubis	5–13	0.01	22%	13 May →
nuke	13–7	0.01	28%	12 May →
train	5–13	-0.04	36%	3 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	13%	4 Mar →
nuke	13–8	0.10	18%	29 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	24%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	25%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.16	33%	30 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	13%	23 May →
inferno	13–6	-0.06	33%	22 May →