Rang3r 0bi

Rang3r 0bi — CS2 Stats

CA76561198049358455[U:1:89092727]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,554Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#19497 of 20317 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,475Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,475
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 56 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRang3r 0biPEAK ELO1,475csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning56
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateWLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression6.8
Utility7.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 680ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.6
Utility7.5
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time686ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 686ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 11–1
132Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
1112In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35181751%0.01
cacheA159660%0.02
anubisD1441029%-0.00
infernoB147750%-0.00
dust2C125742%-0.01
nukeA74357%-0.04
overpass1010%-0.08
train110100%-0.01
office1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,126Matches
50%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
87.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25150%1.2317.8
Inferno15856%1.2018.9
Anubis8748%1.2418.3
Dust26340%1.1417.4
Ancient2524%1.0516.1
Nuke2241%1.0316.4
Cache1362%1.2819.8
Overpass633%1.3118.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.4%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
12.7°Preaim
680msReaction time
32.0%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
8.75HE damage / grenade
18.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7421° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0113%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0328%27 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0031%27 Aug
cache13–90.0024%26 Aug
anubis11–130.0216%25 Aug
mirage13–40.0522%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0114%23 Aug
cache13–2-0.0228%22 Aug
anubis13–100.0223%21 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0623%21 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0527%19 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0514%19 Aug
dust28–130.0316%7 Aug
cache13–90.0122%27 Jul
cache5–13-0.0520%23 Jul
anubis11–130.0313%23 Jul
mirage13–70.0330%22 Jul
inferno13–160.0721%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0714%17 Jul
anubis9–130.0326%16 Jul
mirage13–110.0322%15 Jul
mirage13–90.0923%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0120%14 Jul
anubis6–130.0233%12 Jul
cache13–110.0816%11 Jul
cache8–130.0126%29 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0925%25 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0526%25 Jun
dust212–120.0324%23 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0427%22 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0310%22 Jun
cache2–130.0523%22 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0315%22 Jun
mirage13–60.0627%22 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0022%21 Jun
inferno13–8-0.057%20 Jun
mirage15–150.0217%20 Jun
nuke7–13-0.1112%20 Jun
mirage13–50.0715%19 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0411%19 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0728%19 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0225%18 Jun
dust213–8-0.035%18 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0321%18 Jun
inferno13–110.0423%16 Jun
cache16–140.0717%16 Jun
anubis11–130.0418%16 Jun
dust213–9-0.0129%16 Jun
mirage13–90.0421%15 Jun
mirage13–90.0819%15 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0414%14 Jun
nuke16–190.0020%14 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0137%14 Jun
dust29–13-0.0418%14 Jun
mirage8–13-0.076%14 Jun
dust27–13-0.0235%14 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0722%14 Jun
cache13–90.0018%14 Jun
mirage13–160.0518%13 Jun
dust21–13-0.0530%12 Jun
inferno6–130.0117%12 Jun
anubis4–130.0126%11 Jun
mirage11–130.0317%10 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0327%10 Jun
cache10–130.0411%10 Jun
mirage11–130.0121%9 Jun
mirage16–140.0222%8 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0320%8 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0132%7 Jun
dust213–10-0.0121%7 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0223%7 Jun
inferno13–110.0218%7 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0821%7 Jun
dust216–13-0.0316%7 Jun
train13–9-0.0128%6 Jun
mirage5–130.0318%5 Jun
anubis7–13-0.046%5 Jun
office7–130.0127%5 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0820%5 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0211%4 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0033%4 Jun
mirage17–19-0.0118%3 Jun
inferno13–100.028%3 Jun
cache13–110.0517%2 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0640%2 Jun
anubis13–40.0828%2 Jun
cache13–90.0815%1 Jun
mirage13–70.0727%31 May
anubis13–110.0210%29 May
dust22–13-0.1236%29 May
dust210–13-0.037%28 May
inferno13–100.0114%27 May
mirage13–100.0025%26 May
inferno13–100.0318%26 May
inferno13–9-0.0815%25 May
mirage16–130.0519%25 May
nuke3–13-0.0767%25 May
cache13–30.0429%25 May
dust211–10.1244%25 May
cache9–13-0.0117%24 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →