✪ LaPerle — CS2 Stats

76561198047897470[U:1:87631742]

1,308Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,616Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5008 of 17383 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

22,616Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,616
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,384 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ LaPerleFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,616 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning48
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62344Last 10062%Win rateLWWWLLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression6.0
Utility6.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch0.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.8
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time594ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — nuke
17Longest win streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2015575%0.01
cacheB178947%0.02
dust2B179853%0.01
infernoA159660%0.01
anubisC83538%0.03
ancientS86275%0.04
nukeS660100%0.04
overpassA53260%-0.01
vertigo330100%0.02
office1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches
55%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
65.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1573%1.3317.3
Ancient956%1.1715.9
Anubis650%1.1616.3
Vertigo650%1.0418.5
Nuke450%1.3115.0
Overpass450%1.3316.0
Inferno367%1.2121.7
Dust21100%1.0028.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
585msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.40HE damage / grenade
12.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2745% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–13-0.0414%28 Aug
cache13–7-0.0112%28 Aug
inferno13–110.0828%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0223%27 Aug
cache3–13-0.0832%26 Aug
anubis5–130.0622%26 Aug
inferno13–80.0417%26 Aug
cache12–12-0.0123%26 Aug
mirage13–110.1116%22 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0615%22 Aug
ancient5–130.0515%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0411%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0114%18 Aug
dust22–00.0550%18 Aug
cache1–130.0314%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0320%18 Aug
dust212–12-0.0621%4 Aug
cache11–130.0315%4 Aug
inferno13–40.018%4 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0513%3 Aug
office9–13-0.0629%11 Jul
nuke7–40.0840%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0715%6 Jul
ancient13–30.0813%3 Jul
cache13–50.0430%3 Jul
cache5–130.0329%3 Jul
anubis7–130.0420%30 Jun
cache13–100.0919%30 Jun
inferno13–110.1018%29 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0616%29 Jun
dust28–130.0612%29 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0513%21 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0610%14 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0420%7 Jun
ancient13–60.0613%7 Jun
cache13–30.068%7 Jun
dust27–50.039%7 Jun
nuke13–20.0638%7 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0414%7 Jun
cache9–13-0.0218%6 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0416%6 Jun
cache5–13-0.0410%6 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0111%31 May
dust213–11-0.0316%31 May
inferno13–100.0227%31 May
dust213–90.0522%18 May
anubis13–110.0223%18 May
cache13–110.0320%18 May
mirage13–100.0116%17 May
mirage13–30.1212%6 May
mirage13–7-0.024%6 May
dust213–90.0619%5 May
cache13–90.0512%5 May
dust213–70.0626%5 May
cache13–110.0517%5 May
cache11–130.0126%4 May
overpass13–60.0722%4 May
cache9–130.0030%3 May
cache7–4-0.0111%3 May
dust211–130.019%24 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0222%24 Apr
dust23–13-0.0438%22 Apr
inferno0–7-0.0338%22 Apr
inferno13–90.0230%21 Apr
mirage13–70.0926%21 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0524%21 Apr
inferno13–50.0715%21 Apr
mirage11–130.0414%21 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0112%20 Apr
mirage13–80.0712%20 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0615%16 Apr
vertigo13–10-0.0321%12 Apr
inferno11–60.0123%12 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0013%12 Apr
dust213–11-0.0116%11 Apr
nuke13–100.0316%11 Apr
dust213–80.0514%11 Apr
ancient6–20.0117%11 Apr
mirage13–100.0115%10 Apr
anubis13–70.0613%9 Apr
mirage13–70.008%9 Apr
vertigo13–30.0020%9 Apr
vertigo13–20.0713%8 Apr
dust213–8-0.0317%7 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0413%7 Apr
nuke13–70.0320%7 Apr
dust24–13-0.0317%7 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0315%7 Apr
mirage16–14-0.028%7 Apr
ancient6–130.0519%7 Apr
dust212–120.0116%6 Apr
ancient13–100.0514%6 Apr
anubis10–130.0920%6 Apr
anubis13–50.0921%6 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0115%6 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0515%6 Apr
nuke13–30.0917%6 Apr
dust212–120.0713%6 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0311%6 Apr
inferno13–60.0613%27 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches17-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →