Kristjan — CS2 Stats

EE76561198047728893[U:1:87463165]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,945Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 Developing

Premier CS Rating18,141Purple band · top ~15.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#24974 of 51895 tracked

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,119 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46

Positioning57

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6

Aggression5.9

Utility4.1

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels1.9

Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6

Positioning5.7

Utility4.1

Mechanics4.7

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time629ms−59ms

first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms

Headshot accuracy11.0%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 9.8% → last ⅓ avg 11.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 13–9

13–2Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 41% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	37	17–20	46%	-0.00
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	0.00
nuke	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.02
cache	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.03
anubis	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.04
inferno	—	4	4–0	100%	-0.04
mirage	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,754Matches

50%Win rate

0.95Avg K/D

76.8ADR

31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	113	52%	0.92	14.5
Ancient	84	55%	0.98	16.0
Inferno	64	50%	0.84	13.9
Anubis	47	55%	0.96	15.0
Mirage	47	43%	0.77	14.0
Nuke	38	37%	0.77	13.6
Cache	12	67%	0.88	13.8
Vertigo	11	55%	0.83	14.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.0%Headshot accuracy

33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

71.1%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

623msReaction time

26.1%T opening success

49.4%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

13.01HE damage / grenade

3.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.0092% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4679 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.1092% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	16–12	-0.05	8%	26 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.03	9%	25 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.01	22%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	3%	25 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	6%	25 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	6%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	10%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	7%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	9%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	10%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	14%	21 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.05	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.06	12%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	11%	20 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	21%	20 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	10%	19 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.04	10%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	13%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.06	11%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	12%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	11%	14 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	7%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	14%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	16%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	16%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	10%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	11%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	4%	5 Aug →
dust2	2–11	-0.05	11%	5 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	10%	5 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.02	10%	5 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	10%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	10%	5 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	14%	5 Aug →
nuke	0–4	-0.01	13%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	10%	3 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	15%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	7%	3 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	10%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	8%	31 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.09	0%	31 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	15%	31 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	10%	31 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.01	6%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.05	9%	29 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	17%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	17%	29 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	11%	28 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.03	14%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	8%	28 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.08	10%	28 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	18%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	14%	28 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.01	8%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.06	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.05	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	10%	26 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.07	14%	26 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.09	11%	26 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.07	13%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	6%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	11%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.08	5%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.05	14%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.07	12%	24 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	14%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	15%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	11%	24 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	7%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	8%	24 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.06	18%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	5%	23 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	13%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.03	15%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	11%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	10%	22 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	8%	22 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	11%	22 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	13%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.01	8%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	5%	22 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	13%	22 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	7%	22 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.02	18%	21 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	11%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	6%	21 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.06	10%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.08	2%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.03	10%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	6%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.08	5%	20 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	4%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.10	14%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.06	13%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	6%	19 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.02	10%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	10%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	8%	18 Jul →