ÐarkSider

ÐarkSider — CS2 Stats

76561198047377228[U:1:87111500]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,352Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating28,294Top 5% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#611 of 43319 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

28,294Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,294
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 1,706 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGÐarkSiderFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER28,294 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning49
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51418Last 10051%Win rateWWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression3.7
Utility3.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.9
Utility3.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time607ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 3–6
130Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 40% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC39172244%0.03
mirageC25101540%0.02
dust2A1912763%-0.01
nukeS64267%0.05
inferno43175%0.03
shelter220100%0.00
anubis220100%-0.03
ancient2020%-0.01
office110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

117Matches
58%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
76.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%1.2619.0
Anubis650%1.1014.5
Inferno40%0.8617.0
Vertigo367%0.8114.3
Nuke20%0.8617.5
Ancient20%0.7516.5
Overpass10%0.386.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
607msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
27.3%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
5.17HE damage / grenade
2.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.3872 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6956% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–20.1519%23 Jul
dust29–00.0627%23 Jul
cache5–130.0028%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0026%23 Jul
cache13–100.0617%23 Jul
mirage13–60.1221%21 Jul
cache13–70.0328%21 Jul
shelter13–11-0.0110%10 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0324%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.058%10 Jul
dust29–13-0.0317%10 Jul
shelter13–60.0210%10 Jul
cache12–12-0.076%9 Jul
mirage4–130.0331%9 Jul
mirage11–130.0528%30 Jun
dust27–13-0.0215%30 Jun
cache9–130.0624%23 Jun
dust216–12-0.0416%23 Jun
cache1–10-0.0713%16 Jun
mirage13–30.0114%16 Jun
mirage13–80.0312%9 Jun
anubis12–50.0021%9 Jun
mirage10–130.0019%3 Jun
dust213–0-0.000%3 Jun
inferno13–110.0212%27 May
dust214–16-0.0421%27 May
inferno13–110.0531%26 May
ancient2–130.0523%26 May
dust26–13-0.0215%26 May
ancient7–13-0.0622%26 May
cache13–30.1422%23 May
nuke13–80.0322%23 May
mirage3–13-0.0724%23 May
cache13–40.0621%22 May
mirage12–120.0416%22 May
nuke6–13-0.0319%22 May
anubis13–8-0.0618%22 May
dust213–30.0510%22 May
dust213–9-0.0024%22 May
cache13–90.0310%22 May
cache11–13-0.0118%20 May
mirage16–140.0312%20 May
dust214–160.0414%20 May
mirage2–13-0.0313%18 May
mirage5–13-0.0422%17 May
cache12–120.0125%17 May
cache12–120.0313%12 May
cache13–2-0.0224%12 May
dust213–4-0.0211%12 May
cache13–50.0327%12 May
mirage3–13-0.0827%12 May
cache12–120.0911%12 May
cache13–80.1228%11 May
mirage13–100.0422%11 May
dust213–3-0.0113%11 May
cache13–40.0614%7 May
cache12–120.0116%7 May
cache7–130.0320%7 May
cache13–20.1023%7 May
office13–100.0332%6 May
cache2–13-0.0421%6 May
cache13–70.0621%6 May
cache7–13-0.0010%6 May
mirage13–9-0.0017%6 May
cache8–130.0116%6 May
cache9–130.0122%6 May
dust29–13-0.0412%6 May
cache11–130.0319%5 May
mirage8–13-0.0614%5 May
dust211–13-0.0816%5 May
cache13–110.0318%5 May
mirage13–110.0419%5 May
cache8–130.0219%30 Apr
cache12–120.0335%30 Apr
cache5–130.0118%30 Apr
cache10–130.0013%30 Apr
mirage13–10.2018%30 Apr
cache13–8-0.0411%30 Apr
dust213–9-0.0015%30 Apr
cache13–10.0723%30 Apr
cache13–70.1031%29 Apr
cache1–7-0.0322%28 Apr
cache8–130.0122%28 Apr
cache13–50.1315%28 Apr
cache13–20.0119%28 Apr
mirage13–20.0321%27 Apr
dust213–7-0.0215%27 Apr
mirage13–1-0.0311%27 Apr
nuke13–40.1216%27 Apr
inferno13–60.0019%27 Apr
mirage6–13-0.044%27 Apr
dust213–110.0625%27 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0017%27 Apr
nuke13–30.0531%27 Apr
dust213–90.0242%27 Apr
mirage3–60.2115%25 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0119%25 Apr
inferno5–130.0318%25 Apr
dust213–10-0.0629%25 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0717%25 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →