my bad

my bad — CS2 Stats

76561198046828841[U:1:86563113]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,405Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,285Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1692 of 7997 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmy badFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,285 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning56
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56404Last 10056%Win rateLLWWLTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression8.0
Utility2.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.6
Utility2.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time616ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−5.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.33Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — ancient
9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

boulderBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB21111052%0.01
mirageA149564%0.01
dust2C135838%-0.00
infernoA106460%0.05
ancientA106460%0.01
anubisC83538%-0.03
vertigoA74357%0.04
boulderS64267%0.05
nuke42250%0.02
shelter32167%0.02
office110100%0.08
overpass110100%0.05
train110100%0.02
fachwerk110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

651Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
81.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7254%1.2116.7
Ancient5155%1.1418.0
Inferno5056%1.2718.4
Dust23348%0.9214.8
Anubis2462%1.1516.3
Nuke1533%1.0916.7
Overpass850%1.0916.0
Cache757%1.4918.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
595msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
10.73HE damage / grenade
3.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4616 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6152% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–13-0.0418%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0017%25 Aug
ancient13–100.0414%23 Aug
mirage13–110.0423%23 Aug
cache3–11-0.0531%20 Aug
cache12–120.0110%20 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0614%20 Aug
anubis4–5-0.0933%20 Aug
inferno12–50.1420%16 Aug
cache11–13-0.0418%15 Aug
cache2–7-0.0829%14 Aug
vertigo13–90.0613%11 Aug
vertigo5–130.0417%5 Aug
inferno13–40.037%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0420%31 Jul
inferno13–30.0225%31 Jul
cache8–00.0330%31 Jul
vertigo13–60.1011%30 Jul
vertigo13–6-0.0011%30 Jul
cache13–100.0421%29 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0717%29 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0415%28 Jul
dust213–10-0.0119%28 Jul
ancient13–20.0318%26 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0025%24 Jul
dust213–60.1325%24 Jul
dust213–16-0.0117%23 Jul
dust23–13-0.0813%23 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0018%23 Jul
dust26–130.0120%23 Jul
boulder13–60.0228%22 Jul
ancient1–130.0427%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0525%22 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0915%22 Jul
cache2–13-0.1217%21 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0821%21 Jul
vertigo13–90.0112%21 Jul
vertigo11–130.0312%21 Jul
office13–80.0817%20 Jul
mirage13–30.0624%19 Jul
dust213–110.0413%19 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0317%19 Jul
boulder13–70.0920%18 Jul
overpass13–110.0521%17 Jul
boulder13–80.0812%17 Jul
dust213–100.0323%17 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0514%17 Jul
boulder4–130.0020%17 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0121%16 Jul
vertigo9–130.0119%16 Jul
cache5–130.0718%16 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0420%16 Jul
dust213–7-0.0126%16 Jul
cache9–130.0619%16 Jul
dust210–13-0.0115%15 Jul
shelter13–5-0.0232%15 Jul
cache3–13-0.0823%14 Jul
ancient13–30.0118%14 Jul
cache13–80.0218%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0713%14 Jul
cache13–90.0332%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0521%14 Jul
inferno13–40.0616%14 Jul
dust211–130.0224%14 Jul
mirage13–30.3326%13 Jul
nuke13–90.0220%13 Jul
train13–90.0217%13 Jul
cache13–80.0426%13 Jul
inferno12–120.0520%13 Jul
cache11–20.0631%13 Jul
cache12–120.1330%12 Jul
ancient4–13-0.1113%12 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0244%12 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0221%12 Jul
boulder13–40.1127%12 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0729%12 Jul
shelter13–90.0820%10 Jul
anubis9–130.0117%9 Jul
cache4–00.0350%9 Jul
mirage13–110.0219%9 Jul
fachwerk13–90.0111%9 Jul
ancient13–50.0216%9 Jul
inferno13–80.0725%9 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0241%9 Jul
boulder5–13-0.0327%9 Jul
ancient9–130.0021%8 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0521%8 Jul
dust25–13-0.0633%8 Jul
cache13–9-0.036%8 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0115%8 Jul
inferno3–130.0534%8 Jul
nuke4–90.0950%7 Jul
mirage13–90.0217%7 Jul
inferno11–130.1423%6 Jul
cache7–13-0.0433%6 Jul
cache13–10-0.0020%6 Jul
ancient13–110.0619%6 Jul
cache13–90.0128%5 Jul
inferno13–100.0214%5 Jul
cache13–40.0322%5 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →