2SELL — CS2 Stats

FI76561198043348708[U:1:83082980]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

168Tracked matches63%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.3 Developing

Premier CS Rating2,802Grey band · top ~88.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#26995 of 34518 tracked

WingmanSilver II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46

Positioning63

Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWLLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6

Aggression9.9

Utility2.3

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6

Positioning6.3

Utility2.3

Mechanics2.7

Opening Duels4.9

Win Impact9.4

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time631ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms

Headshot accuracy11.3%−3.4%

first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 11.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — anubis 13–3

13–0Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	31	17–14	55%	0.02
mirage	A	18	10–8	56%	0.04
dust2	D	16	5–11	31%	0.01
inferno	S	8	6–2	75%	0.08
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.03
nuke	D	7	2–5	29%	0.01
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	0.06
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.0%Headshot accuracy

36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.3%Spray accuracy

61.9%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

629msReaction time

38.0%T opening success

61.0%CT opening success

0.31Enemies flashed / flash

0.6%Flash assists

10.13HE damage / grenade

1.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 10.991% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3055 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.0486% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–4	0.03	9%	12 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	7%	11 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	2%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	10%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	9%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	12%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	5%	3 Aug →
inferno	9–2	0.15	6%	1 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	9%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.10	13%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.07	4%	31 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.06	12%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	13%	31 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	16%	29 Jul →
cache	9–1	0.03	21%	29 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	6%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.08	4%	29 Jul →
nuke	9–5	0.13	17%	29 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.02	19%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–12	0.08	12%	28 Jul →
poseidon	9–6	-0.02	21%	28 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.14	17%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.06	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.08	8%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.08	8%	28 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.08	8%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.06	10%	27 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	22%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	6%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.07	13%	26 Jul →
train	13–10	0.07	14%	24 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	14%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	14%	24 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	0%	24 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	10%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–2	0.10	3%	23 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	10%	23 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	4%	23 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.11	10%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.05	9%	23 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	19%	22 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.11	16%	21 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.03	17%	21 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.07	16%	20 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.04	10%	20 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	24%	20 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	8%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	19%	19 Jul →
inferno	9–5	0.12	6%	19 Jul →
fachwerk	13–2	-0.02	6%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.24	5%	18 Jul →
vertigo	3–13	-0.02	11%	18 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.01	6%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.09	13%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.10	10%	18 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.03	7%	17 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.03	16%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	12%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.10	5%	17 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	8%	17 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	15%	17 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	3%	16 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	9%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	15%	14 Jul →
inferno	9–1	0.18	6%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.09	9%	13 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.07	11%	12 Jul →
ancient	1–9	-0.01	4%	12 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.08	15%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.01	25%	11 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	15%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.12	5%	11 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.03	27%	10 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	4%	10 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.05	15%	10 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	5%	10 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	16%	9 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	18%	9 Jul →
office	13–8	0.04	15%	9 Jul →
office	11–13	0.05	14%	8 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.00	12%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.04	10%	8 Jul →
vertigo	5–0	0.02	23%	8 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.02	20%	8 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.03	3%	7 Jul →
vertigo	7–13	0.02	12%	7 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	24%	7 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.05	28%	7 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	21%	6 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	25%	6 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.04	16%	6 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	18%	2 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	18%	30 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.08	5%	30 Jun →
cache	1–7	-0.10	15%	26 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.09	25%	26 Jun →
cache	13–1	0.06	8%	24 Jun →